Now Even Science Mag Admits Climate Models Are Crap

Summer on the Costa Del Sol circa 2050? (Source)

What has Little Nicky been telling you since we started back in 2005? The whole Anthropogenic Global Warming business is a scam designed to enrich the rich, help government raise stealth taxes in the form of ‘green levies’ on our energy bills, and generate enough fear and panic among the general population we will meekly surrender our freedoms to huddle Under A Sheltering Sky fabricated by supporters of a global bureaucratic dictatorship.

One of the problems with ‘climate science’ is that it relies for evidence of global warming on data extracted from mathematical models of the global climate running in computers. And it has been obvious for some time the output from these models does not match what is happening in reality

It has long been a tactic of the totally dishonest Warmageddonist movement to dismiss any independent (i.e. not supported by Big Global in their various disguises) research as being not by proper scientists.

A few months ago however Science magazine no less presented a compilation of metastudies by respected physicists, meteorologists and environmentalists all of which agree that the models are unreliable. (Science is available online only to subscribers)so I cannot give you a direct link.

Read an extract:

An article in the June 13, 2014, issue of Science admits the computer climate models are not effective at forecasting either future or past temperatures. The Science piece says the current models are “bloated with data,” but still cannot represent such huge variables as clouds and shifts in ocean currents. Statisticians are recommending a re-start.

At the same time, new studies are revealing that the sun has an even bigger role in climate than the current climate models understand.

One of the new papers finds that the amount of time the sun is obscured from the earth by clouds is “highly correlated” with temperatures over the past 50 years. That was true both in the global dimming of the 1960s and 1970s and during the brightening of the 1990s and 2000s. The authors studied 10 climate variables over that period. (Spinoni et al., “Climate of the Carpathian Region in the period 1961–2010,” International Journal of Climatology online.)

The Spinoni team also found a decreasing trend in relative humidity over the past 50 years, which is contrary to the current models’ assumptions. That supports the theory that the greenhouse gas impacts are becoming increasingly saturated and thus less frightening.

Another recent paper in the Journal of Solar and Terrestrial Physics predicts global temperatures will fall by up to 1º C by 2020 due to low solar activity. Solheim et al. note that long solar cycles (like the one we’re currently in) predict more solar dimming. (Solheim et al., “The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24,” Journal of Solar and Terrestrial Physics 80, 2012). Papers like these do not get reported in mainstream media, on broadcast news or by people like that science worshipping twat Brian Cox who has less brain cells than he has testicles – and I’m not sure he has a full set of testicles.[Continue reading at Cfact]

The Whole Thing Can Be Found In Science Mag if you are willing to shell out for a subscription and search their archives. Or you could try the local library. Or you could just stop being obstinate and accept the sceptics were right all along.

Advertisements

One thought on “Now Even Science Mag Admits Climate Models Are Crap

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s