As A Climate Science Sceptic I’ve Often Been Asked Why We Sceptics Do Not Present Our Findings For Peer Review?

Paul Noel
Paul Noel, former Research Scientist 6 Level 2 UAH Huntsville Al. (2009-2014)

 

Ruling Elites support Extinction Rebellion plan for Marxist world to ‘fight climate change’

There is No Climate Emergency Say 500 Climate Scientists

How violent ‘science’ extremism is the true terrorist threat in America today

In the wake of recent revelations that Planned Parenthood was allegedly engaged in the ghoulish practice of selling the body parts of aborted babies, millions of Americans are asking what happened to the soul of their country, and whether it is possible to ever get it back.

If you’ve been following the horrific story, you know that the excuse Planned Parenthood officials gave for engaging in this disgusting practice was to advance biotech “science.” As Breitbart News reported July 14:

An undercover video shot last summer by a new pro-life organization called Center for Medical Progress purports to show the chief medical officer of Planned Parenthood of America talking on camera about how to abort a child intact so the child’s body parts can be transferred for medical and scientific research.

The video also shows what is purported to be an actual online order form from Stem Express complete with a pull-down menu for “brain, heart, heart (veins and arteries attached), lungs, liver, liver and thymus, spleen, large intestine” and so on. The order form also specifies the “gestational range” from 4 weeks upwards.

Students of history will remember, too, that Nazi “doctor” Josef Mengele, also known as the Angel of Death, is infamous for his abuse and “scientific” experimentation on prisoners at the Auschwitz concentration camp. As noted by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum:

He…attempted to demonstrate the “degeneration” of Jewish and “Gypsy” blood through the documentation of physical oddities and the collection and harvesting of tissue samples and body parts. Many of his “test subjects” died as a result of the experimentation or were murdered in order to facilitate post-mortem examination.

Read full article:

RELATED POSTS:
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]…[Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Ian at Minds ]

Once Again The Scientist And Academics Catch Up With Little Nicky

I’ve been telling you throughout the ten years this blog has been running that far too much of what is passed off as ‘science’ these days is nothing but corporate propaganda.

Now increasingly I note that the people who still have a little integrity despite working in the field of scientific research are breaking ranks with the Science Inquisition, that cabal of PhDs tasked with rooting out scientific heresy.

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.” – Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime editor-in-chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ) (source)

Dr. Angell is not the only one of course. Watch this blog to see who else is chalenging the government / corporate narrative.

City of Berkeley to require cellphone sellers to warn of possible radiation risks

Again Little Nicky has to say “I told you so.” Its gets almost embarrassing at times to have to remind all the science worshippers of how many times this blog has been right and their orthodoxy and conformity based methods of research have just led them to swallow great lumps of corporate propaganda unchewed.

One of the fist themes of this blog was that mobile phones (and wi-fi etc.) do pose a risk to health. Here’s the latest admission that the sceptics voices were right, from The Guardian

And finally, we don’t do scaremongering so be assured that if you use your mobile phone / wi-fi sensibly the risks are very small. Don’t spend long periods with your phone clamped to your skull, don’t sit with your wi-fi connected laptop on your lap for long periods (a board or thick tray will protect you) and don’t sit close to your wi-fi router (you should be at least three feet away).

The real question that needs to be asked of the technology corporations but our representatives are not asking is: How much saturation with electro – magnetic mush can our bodies take before we all start to succumb to the new, 21st century disease, electrosensitivity?

Global Warming – The Secret Of The Pause Revealed

How is it then that while real world data shows no significant increase in global mean temperature for eighteen years, the scientists claim real world data iis not reliable and their mathematical models (with are infallible coz its science FFS) show that global warming is happening much faster that even the most fantstical scientific computer models predicted.

Well I do know how actually, I know because Guido told me. And it the answer will leave you gobsmacked.

FRAUDSTER BOFFINS FIDDLE CLIMATE FIGURES – GUIDO FAWKES

GMO: Monsanto’s Worst Nightmare Looks Like Becoming Reality

For years the corporate agriculture industry (Big Ag) cartel and, corporate payroll scientists and opportunistic politicians have been pushing the idea that to switch from traditionally propagated crops to genetically modified organism was the only way to feed the world’s burgeoning millions.

The tame scientists who either worked for Big Ag or were on government funded research programmes were happy to produce doctored data suggesting that Genetically Modified (GM) food crops were completely safe for human consumption. Many independent biologists and geneticists disagreed but their work was derided and the strongest critics of Big Ag were marginalized or found their careers had been steered into a dead end (a familiar story to those of us who have observed the journey of the sciences from open minded inquiry to something resembling a medieval church sect.)

But in what marks a major shift in the way the wider public consume information, the citizen journalists and ‘crazy conspiracy theorists’ of new media have gradually chipped away at the completely fabricated case for GM food crops.

Some, like this blog, have focused on the economic and social consequences of handing control of the food supply to a handful of corporate enterprises with very dodgy track records on ethical matters. Others who are more appropriately qualified to challenge the misinformation and manipulated statistics put out by corporate scientists reported on how data had been faked and trials rigged.

And now it seems the tide is turning against Big Ag and their lackeys:

Monsanto’s Worst Fear May Be Coming True
Jonathan Latham, Independent Science News

The decision of the Chipotle restaurant chain to make its product lines GMO-free is not most people’s idea of a world-historic event. Especially since Chipotle, by US standards, is not a huge operation. A clear sign that the move is significant, however, is that Chipotle’s decision was met with a tidal-wave of establishment media abuse. Chipotle has been called irresponsible, anti-science, irrational, and much more by the Washington Post, Time Magazine, the Chicago Tribune, the LA Times, and many others. A business deciding to give consumers what they want was surely never so contentious.

The media’s heavy criticism of Chipotle has an explanation that is important to the future of GMOs. The cause of it is that there has long been an incipient crack in the solid public front that the food industry has presented on the GMO issue. The crack originates from the fact that while agribusiness sees GMOs as central to their business future, the brand-oriented and customer-sensitive ends of the food supply chain do not.

The brands who sell to the public, such as Nestle, Coca-Cola, Kraft, etc., are therefore much less committed to GMOs. They have gone along with their use, probably because they wish to maintain good relations with agribusiness, who are their allies and their suppliers. Possibly also they see a potential for novel products in a GMO future.

However, over the last five years, as the reputation of GMOs has come under increasing pressure in the US, the cost to food brands of ignoring the growing consumer demand for GMO-free products has increased. They might not say so in public, but the sellers of top brands have little incentive to take the flack for selling GMOs.

READ ALL

RELATED POSTS:
American GM Wheat Losing Out To Russian Organic Wheat In World Markets
We’ve been trying to get the truth out on GM crops, loved by American corporate business, rent-a-quote scientists and politicians for several years. The massed ranks of big money and big politics are still ranged against us but it seems that one again we the New Media are winning. The more the ‘experts’, professors and politicians tell us genetically modified crops are good, the mor suspicious we become.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Monsanto Whistleblower Admits Entire Department Exists to "Discredit” Scientists


Don’t trust the GMO companies until they look you in the eye and say they#d let their kids eat the shite (Image source)

Dare to publish a scientific study against Big Biotech, and the brand leader in GM seed, Monsanto, will mount a campaign similar to a medieval witch hunt, aimed at defaming and discrediting you. All in all this is very similar the what happens in any area of commercial activity in which researcers working in the public interest collide with the science whores who prostitute themselves for corporate money.

Consider climate change, a field in which scepticism of the scientifically flawed case that the minor fluctuations we have seen in climate in recent decades constitute an existential threat to life on earth, but are beyond doubt caused by carbon dioxide emissions associated with human activity.

Though this is a far from unanimous view (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE. While the Warmageddonist zealots (yes, it is like a religion for them and as the links above show, as with the Medieval Catholic Church, heretcs who question the dogma are persecuted) screech that the sceptical voices are funded by the demonic Big Koch (Koch Bros, a US indistrial conglomerate), Big Oil and Big Gas, the Warmageddonists are funded by big government and those engaged in a campaign for global government, and Big Money (Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street investment banks planned before the 2008 crash, to create a $1trillion a year market in trading carbon credits.

All of which shows the self righteous posturing of ‘green’ politicians in a rather different perspective.

It has been much the same case with the propaganda campaign mounted by politicians, the media and biotech industry PR consultants to force the world to replace natural food with genetically modified seed HERE and HERE and HERE.
Now, not for the first time, a Monsanto employee, who still works for the company and so cannot be named, has blown the whistle on the fact that Monsanto are aware of the risks to human health and the environment posed by GMOs. The whistleblower admits that there is an entire department within the corporation with the simple task of ‘discrediting’ and ‘debunking’ scientists who speak out against GMOs.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) recently classified glyphosate, a chemical in Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide Roundup, as carcinogenic – news that is really heating things up with biotech. So Monsanto has been demanding that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) retract their statements about the poisons’s toxicity to human health.

(Don’t pretand you’re shocked, Little Nicky Machiavelli and his friends have been been warning you for ten years about the shite corporate science whores wanted to put in your stomach.)

The company demands this even though a peer-reviewed study published in March of 2015 in the respected journal, The Lancet Oncology, conducted a analysis proving that glyphosate was indeed ‘probably carcinogenic.’

Monsanto’s vice president of global regulatory affairs Philip Miller explained Monsanto’s case (which can be summed up as “don’t fuck with us or you’ll be sorry”) in an interview with Reuters linked below:

CLICK HERE to read the full Monsanto Whistleblower interview

RELATED POSTS:
Corporate Capitalism Has Replaced Democracy In Western Nations.
Although this is about the UK General Election in 2015 it has much wider relevance, concerning what is happening in the democratic societies of the developed nation. For that reason this look at how corporate capitalism is usurping democracy and individual freedom will also be relevant long after that election in May 2025.
Anti-Science – The Church Of Scienceology’s Latest Pejorative Term For People Who Think And Question.
We are not the only web site to take exception to accusations of being anti – science and all the other pejorative terms used by the Church Of Scienceology disciples to deflect criticism from independent minded people who are smart anough to ask Cui Bono? Which corporate business benefits.