Global Warming – The Secret Of The Pause Revealed

How is it then that while real world data shows no significant increase in global mean temperature for eighteen years, the scientists claim real world data iis not reliable and their mathematical models (with are infallible coz its science FFS) show that global warming is happening much faster that even the most fantstical scientific computer models predicted.

Well I do know how actually, I know because Guido told me. And it the answer will leave you gobsmacked.

FRAUDSTER BOFFINS FIDDLE CLIMATE FIGURES – GUIDO FAWKES

Retired professor turns whistleblower on climate change



Warmageddonist cult leader Al Gore is still preaching the alamist gospel despite having been busted for buying up California beach front property he had warned would be swamped by rising sea level.

Academic says: I’m now retired so I have no scientific career to protect by spreading lies

“researchers want to keep federal funding for climate change alive, and politicians want to earn environmentalist votes, and both predict global pandemonium to that end:” Dr. Terry Hughes.

Dr. Terry Hughes, in an interview with The College Fix, said researchers want to keep federal funding for climate change alive, and politicians want to earn environmentalist votes, and both predict global pandemonium to that end.

Hughes, a professor emeritus of earth sciences and climate change at the University of Maine, said for years his colleagues urged him to be in lockstep with former Vice President Al Gore – “the drum major in the parade denouncing global warming as an unmitigated disaster,” he told The College Fix.

But Hughes – who believes global warming is actually a good thing because more carbon dioxide is good for the environment in many ways – said he does not want to march to that beat.

“Too many (the majority of) climate research scientists are quite willing to prostitute their science by giving these politicians what they want,” he said.

from The College Fix

RELATED POSTS:

Polar Temperature Data ‘Proving’ Climate Change Nothing More than a Guess
Dr Benny Peiser who heads up the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), has said temperature readings from the Arctic and Antarctic used to estimate the effects of global warming are nothing more than guesswork. GWPF last month announced its intention to carry out a wide-ranging review of the data underpinning claims on global warming.

Fellow Slams The Royal Society as Nothing But a Lobby Group for Climate Change.
Another respected scientist comes out and denounces the science behind the climate change scare as a fraud. The whole thing has been a scam to justify punitive taxes on fuel and enable the rich to make fortunes trading carbon credits. Again it shows what a sack of rogues the climate science community really are.

Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS*
I’ve had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have been saying that if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related activites the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would all burn. When the scaremongering first started, the deadline for frying was “after dinner”. Then it goT to “Tomorrow …… or the day after tomorrow perhaps,” then “next year”, “before 2050,” and eventually “soon.”

Climate Experts Smeared by Media and Greenpeace for Debunking Global Warming
Anyone who understood basic arithmetic (like how to work out an average) and took the trouble to examine the ‘science’ that backed the climate change scare would have quickly understood the whole thing was a fraud. And plenty of digigent, honest and respected scientists did understand that and were not afraid to say so. But those who went public faced hate attacks, personal smears and having their careers trashed. Now however, as evidence exposes the lies of the global warming lobby, they are starting to come forward.
Climate Experts Smeared by Media and Greenpeace for Debunking Global Warming

Beyond Big Bang: The Idea Of An Infinite Universe Is Fashionable Again
So Big Bang was a proven fact was it. A lot of very noisy science fanboys insisted it was, but of course big Bang was only ever a theory with no more hard evidence to back it up that the biblical creation myth. Perhaps led by the rertn of common sense, the cutting edge research is one again talking about an infinite universe.

Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS

I’ve had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have been saying that the ‘scientific consensus’ had agreed if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related activites (that is, just about all human activities except unprotected sex and sleeping) the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would all burn. Those of us audacious enough to ask when this was going to happen felt the horizon shifting.

Global Warming: The Temple built On Sand Collapses

After the latest Climate Conference in Lima predictable failed to reach any agreement (the delegates agreed that something must be done but did not know what) and the Warmageddonists cheerleading for Carbon Taxes, windmillis smoke and mirrors and all the rest revealed they have no new evidence (not that they ever had any evidence that was not generated by mathematical models of the climate), it has been a good time to really go for the dishonesty of the Global Warming Cult. Here’s a good start:

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

See more:

RELATED POSTS:
Why are people sceptical about climate change?
The Climate Bollocks Of Bill Nye The Stupidity Guy

Now Even Science Mag Admits Climate Models Are Crap

Summer on the Costa Del Sol circa 2050? (Source)

What has Little Nicky been telling you since we started back in 2005? The whole Anthropogenic Global Warming business is a scam designed to enrich the rich, help government raise stealth taxes in the form of ‘green levies’ on our energy bills, and generate enough fear and panic among the general population we will meekly surrender our freedoms to huddle Under A Sheltering Sky fabricated by supporters of a global bureaucratic dictatorship.

One of the problems with ‘climate science’ is that it relies for evidence of global warming on data extracted from mathematical models of the global climate running in computers. And it has been obvious for some time the output from these models does not match what is happening in reality

It has long been a tactic of the totally dishonest Warmageddonist movement to dismiss any independent (i.e. not supported by Big Global in their various disguises) research as being not by proper scientists.

A few months ago however Science magazine no less presented a compilation of metastudies by respected physicists, meteorologists and environmentalists all of which agree that the models are unreliable. (Science is available online only to subscribers)so I cannot give you a direct link.

Read an extract:

An article in the June 13, 2014, issue of Science admits the computer climate models are not effective at forecasting either future or past temperatures. The Science piece says the current models are “bloated with data,” but still cannot represent such huge variables as clouds and shifts in ocean currents. Statisticians are recommending a re-start.

At the same time, new studies are revealing that the sun has an even bigger role in climate than the current climate models understand.

One of the new papers finds that the amount of time the sun is obscured from the earth by clouds is “highly correlated” with temperatures over the past 50 years. That was true both in the global dimming of the 1960s and 1970s and during the brightening of the 1990s and 2000s. The authors studied 10 climate variables over that period. (Spinoni et al., “Climate of the Carpathian Region in the period 1961–2010,” International Journal of Climatology online.)

The Spinoni team also found a decreasing trend in relative humidity over the past 50 years, which is contrary to the current models’ assumptions. That supports the theory that the greenhouse gas impacts are becoming increasingly saturated and thus less frightening.

Another recent paper in the Journal of Solar and Terrestrial Physics predicts global temperatures will fall by up to 1º C by 2020 due to low solar activity. Solheim et al. note that long solar cycles (like the one we’re currently in) predict more solar dimming. (Solheim et al., “The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24,” Journal of Solar and Terrestrial Physics 80, 2012). Papers like these do not get reported in mainstream media, on broadcast news or by people like that science worshipping twat Brian Cox who has less brain cells than he has testicles – and I’m not sure he has a full set of testicles.[Continue reading at Cfact]

The Whole Thing Can Be Found In Science Mag if you are willing to shell out for a subscription and search their archives. Or you could try the local library. Or you could just stop being obstinate and accept the sceptics were right all along.

Climate News: In The Future Public Relations Will Power The World

There’s a wonderful story in today’s Guardian, it reports the shock horror news that leading public relations firms will not work with climate change sceptics. You will see in the headline that brilliantly stupid phrase “climate deniers” is used as if there are people who deny there is such a thing as the climate. Here’s a snippet of the report:

World’s top PR companies rule out working with climate deniers

Some of the world’s top PR companies have for the first time publicly ruled out working with climate change deniers, marking a fundamental shift in the multi-billion dollar industry that has grown up around the issue of global warming.

Public relations firms have played a critical role over the years in framing the debate on climate change and its solutions – as well as the extensive disinformation campaigns launched to block those initiatives.

Now a number of the top 25 global PR firms have told the Guardian they will not represent clients who deny man-made climate change, or take campaigns seeking to block regulations limiting carbon pollution. Companies include WPP, Waggener Edstrom (WE) Worldwide, Weber Shandwick, Text100, and Finn Partners.

“We would not knowingly partner with a client who denies the existence of climate change,” said Rhian Rotz, spokesman for WE.

Weber Shandwick would also not take any campaign to block regulations cutting carbon emissions or promoting renewable energy. “We would not support a campaign that denies the existence and the threat posed by climate change, or efforts to obstruct regulations cutting greenhouse gas emissions and/or renewable energy standards,” spokeswoman Michelle Selesky said.

Oh no, the world will be plunged into chaos if Public Relations firms withdraw their services from the cause of common sense (not.)

Panic buying will cities as punters stock up on PR. ‘At this rate we will run out of PR all together in less than three years!’ says PR spokesman.

Scientists will beging frenetic efforts to find sustainable alternatives to PR.

‘PR could be made to work entirely on wind’, a leading scientologist abbounced.

Energy minister Ed Davey said, ‘This shows how wise we were to invest in wind turbines. Wind is driven entirely by PR’.

wind energy
Wind energy produces lots of heat (source)

The cause of common sense does not require expensive PR firms who have demonstrated their talent for getting their arses kicked by the blogosphere. There are plenty of citizen journalists doing a far better job than the pulled pork munching, metrosexual media luvvies who have totally lost the case for Anthropogenic Global Warming (to be fair the professional PR agencies were given the impossible task of selling a pile of steaming bullshit shovelled together by crap scientists whose idea of debate when challenged is to scream “You’re not a scientist so you don’t understand science. Therefore you aren’t allowed an opinion.

Unfortunately for the Warmageddonists there are many in the cybersphere who understand the science very well. Like the guy wot wrote this:

More than 30% of the solar energy at the top of the atmosphere never makes it to Earth’s surface. Ozone and Oxygen absorb some, CO2 absorbs in three bands of incoming, but Earth never gets hot enough to emit in any more than the 14.77 micron range for CO2 absorption. Since water vapor also absorbs in this band it had to be included as a “magic” warming gas. Water vapor absorbs in over 50,000 bands of incoming solar energy. Read a full AGW post mortem, Strange Tale of Green House Gas Gang by Joseph A Olson, PE at Faux Science Slayer

Little Nicky is always more interested in the economic implications than the science bollocks of course, and if we look as the case of the PR firms described in The Guardian, we see an example of a growing trend, business working with government to affect a ‘desired’ outcome: that’s called corporatism, (also known as crony capitalism, but it is about as similar to capitalism as anticlockwise is to clockwise). As Italian fascist leader Benito Mussoline said, Corporatism is fascism.

So what we are looking at as the goal og the Green / AGW agenda is the economic model of Fascism. Of course, as Orwell observed in 1946, fascism has lost all meaning other than to mean something unpleasant. So while the new fascists can get away with describing themselves as liberal or progressive left, people will be tricked into sleepwalking towards fascism, refusing to see what’s staring them in the face.

Britain’s secret bid to ‘fix’ UN climate report: Impact on economy is exaggerated

British officials were last night accused of ‘political interference’ in a crucial report on international climate change.

The economic impact of global warming was ramped up in the final draft by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Shortly before authors wrote the final version, a British Government official passed scientists a note complaining about an earlier, more moderate draft.

The official, from (Shit)Ed Davey’s Department for Energy and Climate Change, said the economic section of the report was at best an ‘under-estimate’ and at worst ‘completely meaningless’. The final document, published today in Japan, increases the predicted economic impact of global warming.

Continue reading:

RELATED POSTS:
Climate Controled Communities – Science Leading The Rush To Fascism
Kerry stops Short Of Saying Climate Science Scepticism Is a Crime But …

UK professor refuses to put his name to ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey .

A UK academic has refused to put his name to the ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey that he claims is exaggerating the effects of climate change.

A climate scientist has accused the United Nations of being too alarmist over global warming – and demanded his name be removed from a crucial new report.

Professor Richard Tol, an economist at the University of Sussex, said fellow UN academics were exaggerating climate change and comparing it to the ‘apocalypse’.

His comments are a blow to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which on Monday will publish its first update in seven years on the impacts of climate change.

Previous IPCC reports on climate impact have been plagued by errors that damaged the body’s credibility.

Continue reading:

RELATED POSTS:
The Science Fraud: Many Scientific Research Papers Are Pure Gobbledegook