Global Warming – The Secret Of The Pause Revealed

How is it then that while real world data shows no significant increase in global mean temperature for eighteen years, the scientists claim real world data iis not reliable and their mathematical models (with are infallible coz its science FFS) show that global warming is happening much faster that even the most fantstical scientific computer models predicted.

Well I do know how actually, I know because Guido told me. And it the answer will leave you gobsmacked.

FRAUDSTER BOFFINS FIDDLE CLIMATE FIGURES – GUIDO FAWKES

Retired professor turns whistleblower on climate change



Warmageddonist cult leader Al Gore is still preaching the alamist gospel despite having been busted for buying up California beach front property he had warned would be swamped by rising sea level.

Academic says: I’m now retired so I have no scientific career to protect by spreading lies

“researchers want to keep federal funding for climate change alive, and politicians want to earn environmentalist votes, and both predict global pandemonium to that end:” Dr. Terry Hughes.

Dr. Terry Hughes, in an interview with The College Fix, said researchers want to keep federal funding for climate change alive, and politicians want to earn environmentalist votes, and both predict global pandemonium to that end.

Hughes, a professor emeritus of earth sciences and climate change at the University of Maine, said for years his colleagues urged him to be in lockstep with former Vice President Al Gore – “the drum major in the parade denouncing global warming as an unmitigated disaster,” he told The College Fix.

But Hughes – who believes global warming is actually a good thing because more carbon dioxide is good for the environment in many ways – said he does not want to march to that beat.

“Too many (the majority of) climate research scientists are quite willing to prostitute their science by giving these politicians what they want,” he said.

from The College Fix

RELATED POSTS:

Polar Temperature Data ‘Proving’ Climate Change Nothing More than a Guess
Dr Benny Peiser who heads up the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), has said temperature readings from the Arctic and Antarctic used to estimate the effects of global warming are nothing more than guesswork. GWPF last month announced its intention to carry out a wide-ranging review of the data underpinning claims on global warming.

Fellow Slams The Royal Society as Nothing But a Lobby Group for Climate Change.
Another respected scientist comes out and denounces the science behind the climate change scare as a fraud. The whole thing has been a scam to justify punitive taxes on fuel and enable the rich to make fortunes trading carbon credits. Again it shows what a sack of rogues the climate science community really are.

Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS*
I’ve had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have been saying that if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related activites the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would all burn. When the scaremongering first started, the deadline for frying was “after dinner”. Then it goT to “Tomorrow …… or the day after tomorrow perhaps,” then “next year”, “before 2050,” and eventually “soon.”

Climate Experts Smeared by Media and Greenpeace for Debunking Global Warming
Anyone who understood basic arithmetic (like how to work out an average) and took the trouble to examine the ‘science’ that backed the climate change scare would have quickly understood the whole thing was a fraud. And plenty of digigent, honest and respected scientists did understand that and were not afraid to say so. But those who went public faced hate attacks, personal smears and having their careers trashed. Now however, as evidence exposes the lies of the global warming lobby, they are starting to come forward.
Climate Experts Smeared by Media and Greenpeace for Debunking Global Warming

Beyond Big Bang: The Idea Of An Infinite Universe Is Fashionable Again
So Big Bang was a proven fact was it. A lot of very noisy science fanboys insisted it was, but of course big Bang was only ever a theory with no more hard evidence to back it up that the biblical creation myth. Perhaps led by the rertn of common sense, the cutting edge research is one again talking about an infinite universe.

Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS

I’ve had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have been saying that the ‘scientific consensus’ had agreed if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related activites (that is, just about all human activities except unprotected sex and sleeping) the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would all burn. Those of us audacious enough to ask when this was going to happen felt the horizon shifting.

Global Warming: The Temple built On Sand Collapses

After the latest Climate Conference in Lima predictable failed to reach any agreement (the delegates agreed that something must be done but did not know what) and the Warmageddonists cheerleading for Carbon Taxes, windmillis smoke and mirrors and all the rest revealed they have no new evidence (not that they ever had any evidence that was not generated by mathematical models of the climate), it has been a good time to really go for the dishonesty of the Global Warming Cult. Here’s a good start:

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

See more:

RELATED POSTS:
Why are people sceptical about climate change?
The Climate Bollocks Of Bill Nye The Stupidity Guy

Now Even Science Mag Admits Climate Models Are Crap

Summer on the Costa Del Sol circa 2050? (Source)

What has Little Nicky been telling you since we started back in 2005? The whole Anthropogenic Global Warming business is a scam designed to enrich the rich, help government raise stealth taxes in the form of ‘green levies’ on our energy bills, and generate enough fear and panic among the general population we will meekly surrender our freedoms to huddle Under A Sheltering Sky fabricated by supporters of a global bureaucratic dictatorship.

One of the problems with ‘climate science’ is that it relies for evidence of global warming on data extracted from mathematical models of the global climate running in computers. And it has been obvious for some time the output from these models does not match what is happening in reality

It has long been a tactic of the totally dishonest Warmageddonist movement to dismiss any independent (i.e. not supported by Big Global in their various disguises) research as being not by proper scientists.

A few months ago however Science magazine no less presented a compilation of metastudies by respected physicists, meteorologists and environmentalists all of which agree that the models are unreliable. (Science is available online only to subscribers)so I cannot give you a direct link.

Read an extract:

An article in the June 13, 2014, issue of Science admits the computer climate models are not effective at forecasting either future or past temperatures. The Science piece says the current models are “bloated with data,” but still cannot represent such huge variables as clouds and shifts in ocean currents. Statisticians are recommending a re-start.

At the same time, new studies are revealing that the sun has an even bigger role in climate than the current climate models understand.

One of the new papers finds that the amount of time the sun is obscured from the earth by clouds is “highly correlated” with temperatures over the past 50 years. That was true both in the global dimming of the 1960s and 1970s and during the brightening of the 1990s and 2000s. The authors studied 10 climate variables over that period. (Spinoni et al., “Climate of the Carpathian Region in the period 1961–2010,” International Journal of Climatology online.)

The Spinoni team also found a decreasing trend in relative humidity over the past 50 years, which is contrary to the current models’ assumptions. That supports the theory that the greenhouse gas impacts are becoming increasingly saturated and thus less frightening.

Another recent paper in the Journal of Solar and Terrestrial Physics predicts global temperatures will fall by up to 1º C by 2020 due to low solar activity. Solheim et al. note that long solar cycles (like the one we’re currently in) predict more solar dimming. (Solheim et al., “The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24,” Journal of Solar and Terrestrial Physics 80, 2012). Papers like these do not get reported in mainstream media, on broadcast news or by people like that science worshipping twat Brian Cox who has less brain cells than he has testicles – and I’m not sure he has a full set of testicles.[Continue reading at Cfact]

The Whole Thing Can Be Found In Science Mag if you are willing to shell out for a subscription and search their archives. Or you could try the local library. Or you could just stop being obstinate and accept the sceptics were right all along.

Climate News: In The Future Public Relations Will Power The World

There’s a wonderful story in today’s Guardian, it reports the shock horror news that leading public relations firms will not work with climate change sceptics. You will see in the headline that brilliantly stupid phrase “climate deniers” is used as if there are people who deny there is such a thing as the climate. Here’s a snippet of the report:

World’s top PR companies rule out working with climate deniers

Some of the world’s top PR companies have for the first time publicly ruled out working with climate change deniers, marking a fundamental shift in the multi-billion dollar industry that has grown up around the issue of global warming.

Public relations firms have played a critical role over the years in framing the debate on climate change and its solutions – as well as the extensive disinformation campaigns launched to block those initiatives.

Now a number of the top 25 global PR firms have told the Guardian they will not represent clients who deny man-made climate change, or take campaigns seeking to block regulations limiting carbon pollution. Companies include WPP, Waggener Edstrom (WE) Worldwide, Weber Shandwick, Text100, and Finn Partners.

“We would not knowingly partner with a client who denies the existence of climate change,” said Rhian Rotz, spokesman for WE.

Weber Shandwick would also not take any campaign to block regulations cutting carbon emissions or promoting renewable energy. “We would not support a campaign that denies the existence and the threat posed by climate change, or efforts to obstruct regulations cutting greenhouse gas emissions and/or renewable energy standards,” spokeswoman Michelle Selesky said.

Oh no, the world will be plunged into chaos if Public Relations firms withdraw their services from the cause of common sense (not.)

Panic buying will cities as punters stock up on PR. ‘At this rate we will run out of PR all together in less than three years!’ says PR spokesman.

Scientists will beging frenetic efforts to find sustainable alternatives to PR.

‘PR could be made to work entirely on wind’, a leading scientologist abbounced.

Energy minister Ed Davey said, ‘This shows how wise we were to invest in wind turbines. Wind is driven entirely by PR’.

wind energy
Wind energy produces lots of heat (source)

The cause of common sense does not require expensive PR firms who have demonstrated their talent for getting their arses kicked by the blogosphere. There are plenty of citizen journalists doing a far better job than the pulled pork munching, metrosexual media luvvies who have totally lost the case for Anthropogenic Global Warming (to be fair the professional PR agencies were given the impossible task of selling a pile of steaming bullshit shovelled together by crap scientists whose idea of debate when challenged is to scream “You’re not a scientist so you don’t understand science. Therefore you aren’t allowed an opinion.

Unfortunately for the Warmageddonists there are many in the cybersphere who understand the science very well. Like the guy wot wrote this:

More than 30% of the solar energy at the top of the atmosphere never makes it to Earth’s surface. Ozone and Oxygen absorb some, CO2 absorbs in three bands of incoming, but Earth never gets hot enough to emit in any more than the 14.77 micron range for CO2 absorption. Since water vapor also absorbs in this band it had to be included as a “magic” warming gas. Water vapor absorbs in over 50,000 bands of incoming solar energy. Read a full AGW post mortem, Strange Tale of Green House Gas Gang by Joseph A Olson, PE at Faux Science Slayer

Little Nicky is always more interested in the economic implications than the science bollocks of course, and if we look as the case of the PR firms described in The Guardian, we see an example of a growing trend, business working with government to affect a ‘desired’ outcome: that’s called corporatism, (also known as crony capitalism, but it is about as similar to capitalism as anticlockwise is to clockwise). As Italian fascist leader Benito Mussoline said, Corporatism is fascism.

So what we are looking at as the goal og the Green / AGW agenda is the economic model of Fascism. Of course, as Orwell observed in 1946, fascism has lost all meaning other than to mean something unpleasant. So while the new fascists can get away with describing themselves as liberal or progressive left, people will be tricked into sleepwalking towards fascism, refusing to see what’s staring them in the face.

Britain’s secret bid to ‘fix’ UN climate report: Impact on economy is exaggerated

British officials were last night accused of ‘political interference’ in a crucial report on international climate change.

The economic impact of global warming was ramped up in the final draft by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Shortly before authors wrote the final version, a British Government official passed scientists a note complaining about an earlier, more moderate draft.

The official, from (Shit)Ed Davey’s Department for Energy and Climate Change, said the economic section of the report was at best an ‘under-estimate’ and at worst ‘completely meaningless’. The final document, published today in Japan, increases the predicted economic impact of global warming.

Continue reading:

RELATED POSTS:
Climate Controled Communities – Science Leading The Rush To Fascism
Kerry stops Short Of Saying Climate Science Scepticism Is a Crime But …

UK professor refuses to put his name to ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey .

A UK academic has refused to put his name to the ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey that he claims is exaggerating the effects of climate change.

A climate scientist has accused the United Nations of being too alarmist over global warming – and demanded his name be removed from a crucial new report.

Professor Richard Tol, an economist at the University of Sussex, said fellow UN academics were exaggerating climate change and comparing it to the ‘apocalypse’.

His comments are a blow to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which on Monday will publish its first update in seven years on the impacts of climate change.

Previous IPCC reports on climate impact have been plagued by errors that damaged the body’s credibility.

Continue reading:

RELATED POSTS:
The Science Fraud: Many Scientific Research Papers Are Pure Gobbledegook

If We Do Not Act Global Cooling Will Kill Millions

I’m fed up of telling you … so here’s something from The Daily Sheeple for all the fools who still believe in the omnipotence and infallibity of the almighty Hockey Stick

“Climate change is a way of raising money for governments that just won’t admit they were wrong. It’s a way of taxing us to the point where we can barely afford to put food on the table. It’s a way of instilling fear into children, installing the ‘problems’ in their impressionable minds so that they grow up accepting and not questioning that global warming is an issue.

The change of title from global warming to climate change was subtle. It was a change that was designed to cover all bases. The term global warming signifies just that, that the world is warming. We know it isn’t, it’s cooling. The data bears this out and has done so for the last decade. When the warming stopped back in 1998 it created a problem for our fraudster government, along with all other governments that had bought into the global warming hype. How could they call a problem global warming when the world had actually stopped warming?

For a couple of years there was a hiatus, the Earth stayed roughly where it was, and then the cooling began, and the term climate change came into popular usage, particularly by politicians.

There is nothing wrong with believing the science of the day. Looking back it did indeed appear that the planet was heating up…i

Read more at The Daily Sheeple:

Is This The End For The Climate Science Scam?

Little Nicky and his friends at Boggart Blog and The Daily Stirrer have told you so many times that the whole Anthropogenic Global Warming scare was a government – academic scam. “The science is settled,” the evil, coneheaded wonks screamed.

Fuck the science, look at the flaws in the junior school level arithmetic, little Nicky taunted. What to know who was right, look at this:

from Principia Scientific

“A newly-uncovered and monumental calculating error in official US government climate data shows beyond doubt that climate scientists unjustifiably added on a whopping one degree of phantom warming to the official “raw” temperature record. Skeptics believe the discovery may trigger the biggest of all “climate con” scandals in Congress and sound the death knell on American climate policy.

Independent data analyst, Steven Goddard, today (January 19, 2014) released his telling study of the officially adjusted and “homogenized” US temperature records relied upon by NASA, NOAA, USHCN and scientists around the world to “prove” our climate has been warming dangerously.

Goddard reports, “I spent the evening comparing graphs…and hit the NOAA motherlode.” His diligent research exposed the real reason why there is a startling disparity between the “raw” thermometer readings, as reported by measuring stations, and the “adjusted” temperatures, those that appear in official charts and government reports. In effect, the adjustments to the “raw” thermometer measurements made by the climate scientists “turns a 90 year cooling trend into a warming trend,” says the astonished Goddard.”

endquote

Read full article: New Climate Data Rigging Scandal Rocks US Government

Be interesting to see how the neo – fascists at the BBC spin this one, especially the anti – democracy shits on the Radio 4 Today programme. After all, the global warming scare was the foundation of the globalist push for totalitarian world government.

RELATED POSTS:
The Bloggies (Blogosphere Oscars) cancel science category because the wrong people keep winning.
Climate Predictions, Economics and Realities
Wind farms: Is Common Sense Breaking Out In The Warmageddonist Industry?

Storm, what storm?

“Oh there’s going to be a terrible, terrible storm,” chorused the meteorologists at the met. office, echoed by the CAGWARTs of the BBC and the fearmongers of the political establishment. “Winds so strong they would blow a nun’s knickers off or blow the sun out of its orbit around Brian Cox’s grin, raid so hard it would wash clean the blood from Macbeth’s hand (link) and shit in such copious shitloads it would stop all travel, business, commerce and sexual activity all over Britain for months.

So what happened? I drove from Accrington to Bolton over an exposed road across the moors earlier and it was a bit windy but not enough to curtail my speed. There was a bit of rain but never enough to warrant putting the wipers on high speed. And businesses were doing business as usual.

“Ah but aren’t you northerners well hard and used to such atrocious conditions Little Nicky, you might well ask.

Yes and no, yes we are used to such conditions and no they are not atrocious, if fact they are pretty normal for this time of year.

Could it be the computer models that promised us global warming at an accelerating rate until we all fried just as the time global getting a little bit milder accelerated to a standstill got it wrong again?

Was it all just hyperbole or do the science worshipper so desperately need to belive that if we do not shout down all conventional power generation now and reclaim the lifestyles of bronze age goat botherers, the demon Carbonzebub will destroy the world?

Maybe the CAGWARTs hyped the threat of this weather system in the hope that the principle of cosmic attraction would attract a storm that they could then blame on global warming, you know like Noel Edmonds wished for a television comeback. Weell much as I would like to blame global warning for Noel Edmonds, that’s stretching things a bit far.

No, these believers in magic, miracles and fairies hoped to use the storm to press their case for covering our beautiful landscape in windmills and mirrors ,to further their agenda of living in a clean green dystopia with no heat, light, television or recorded music.

Here’s an interesting infographic showing how much of our beautiful landscape would have to be covered in ugly technological monstrosities to make up for just one large power station.

And as you digest that remember no matter how many of those bloody things are installed, they still don’t generate electricity when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun does not shine.

And shutting down electricity generation would not stop the storm because the planet had plenty of extreme weather before we had powerRELATED POSTS:
Will humans become redundant in your lifetime
The Perfect Killing Machine
Human takeover by machines may be closer than we think

Skilled Work Without The Worker

Unemployment Falls As Part Time Working Hits Record Levels And More Drop Out Of The Workforce
UK Unemployment Rises Again as part time jobs increase.
Green Policies Will Not Save The Planet But Are Costing Poor Families The Earth
Slaves Of The Machine
stations.

Despite The Science Being Discredited Mainsteam Media Still Plugs Climate Scare

I don’t get here enough these days, but Populis seem to be getting on top of things, they certainly got rid of the span site penalty, and traffic is going up. So perhaps it’s time Little Nicky Machievelli had a news lease of life:
Here’s something I posted under my Arthur Foxake alter ego:

Despite The Science Being Discredited Mainsteam Media Still Plugs Climate Scare
by Arthur Foxake

Just take a look at this great, steaming heap of bullshit from CNN and ask yourself why anyone watches a channel owned by a billionaire elitist who has openly said he thinks the global population should be reduced from 7 billion to 350 million. It’s a no brainer that the output from any news channel owned by a Nazi shit like Ted Turner is not going to report real news but pump out propaganda designed to brainwash you.
See below what I mean:

(CNN) — Average annual temperatures will start to consistently exceed the highest levels previously recorded in as little as seven years in tropical hotspots and within four decades for the majority of the globe if nothing is done to stop climate change, according to a new study published Thursday in the journal Nature. And by the end of the century, monthly average temperatures will be higher than at any time since at least 1860, according to the study, led by University of Hawaii geographer Camilo Mora.

The effects will be felt first in tropical climates, with the annual temperature range rising beyond the historical range in Manokwari, Indonesia, in 2020, according to a map that accompanies the study on the University of Hawaii website.

Mexico City’s date is 2031. It’s 2046 in Orlando, and a year later in Washington and New York, according to the group. Anchorage, Alaska, doesn’t climb on board until 2071.

“The results shocked us. Regardless of the scenario, changes will be coming soon,” Mora said in a statement posted by the university. “Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”
Read full story from CNN if your reading of choice is fairy tales.

What makes Little Nicky laugh is the confidence these guys have in their predictions for fifty years ahead when they can’t even forecast next weeks weather accurately most of the time

But if you could not be arsed reading the pseudo – scientific bullshit in the CNN item, just take a look at one statement in there that shows what a pack of scaremongering lies this is.

“Monthly average temperatures will be higher than at any time since at least 1860”
So these pseudo scientists, these research grant troughers are so determined to keep their piggy snouts in the swill they make up an idiotic and blatant lie to support their scaremongering.

Hotter than any time since 1860? It is conveniently just before meaningful temperature records began to be kept but if we look at the history books or newspaper archives for 1860 there are no reports of mass extinction, of millions of people starving because crops had withered in parched fields. In fact the average temperature since records began (around 150 years ago)shows a statistical increase of 0.4 of a degree.

Four tenths of a degree in 150 years. At that rate it will be six hundred years before we hit that two degree increase that scientists(but nobody else)thinks is so critical. Surely if these scientists are as clever as they would like us to think, they can devise a faster way to wipe out humanity.

And why would they want to wipe out humanity, you might well ask. Because they can of course, they’re scientists so that’s the only reason they ever need to inflict harm on their fellow humans.

Meanwhile back on Planet Reality

A Record-Setting Blizzard Killed 75,000 Cows and You Might Not Have Even Heard About It

Ranchers are still digging out thousands of their cattle that became buried in a record-setting snowstorm in South Dakota USA late last week and over the weekend. One would think the death of 75,000 cattle caused by upwards of five feet of snow so early in the autumn might get some national attention, or even warrant a world news report in Europe and elsewhere but as one blogger observed, it has taken some time for the news of the precipitation massacre to reach outside of local media.

Well of course, they are usually keen to report climate change but this is the wrong sort of climate change.

Read more on this story

snow in south dakota
Snow reaches mailboxes about four feet above ground in South Dakota

Little Nicky has warned of the replacement of news with propaganda since we started in 2005. People are waking up and relying on alternative news to learn what is really going on. And is it any wonder when traditional media offers us nothing but the bullsit shovelled out by their political masters. Bullshit like this:

Mainstream media all on board latest global warming fear-and-panic bandwagon after IPCC / New World Order report release.
from Natural News:

“Man-made, human-produced carbon dioxide is filling up the atmosphere, heating it to unsustainable temperatures that will ultimately melt the polar ice caps and flood the world.”

That’s the latest fear-mongering “report” from the United Nations’ International Panel on Climate Change. Only, none of that is true, as other climatologists and experts, including those at NASA reported as early as a few years ago.

Of course, none of this makes much difference to the New World Order (Not a real organization but a derogatory reference to those political groups, businesses and academics intent on promoting the idea that only a global, totalitarian government can ave humankind.) owned alarmist mainstream media, most of which has bought into and reported verbatim disproven nonsense regarding nonexistent global warming crises that is still being espoused from people like former Vice President Al Gore, whose own predictions of melting polar caps have been seriously debunked.”

Read more at Natural News

An incomplete list of scientists challenging the idea that global warming is caused solely by Carbon Dioxide emissions generated by human activity can be found at this wikipedia page. A warning however, Wikipedia can be edited by people with an agenda and this page repeats the misleading claim that 97 per cent of scientific papers support the global warming case.

In fact though the majority (not 97%, the authors of the meta analysis referred to assumed the support for their case of scientists who acknowledged that climate change was a problem did not express an opinion on the cause) support the probability that human activity has some imact on the climate, Carbon Dioxide was not identified as the sole cause, some citing deforestation, urbanisation and overpopulation as more significant factors.

According to this report in Forbes magazine the American business news publication only thirty six percent of 1077 scientists surveyed support the carbon Dioxide theory with a large majority suggesting the causes of the slight increase in global mean temperature are natural.

We can find any amount of level headed, objective research and analysis showing that the majority of independent scientists are highly sceptical of the Carbon Dioxide case and the bogus evidence (e.g. the notorious hockey schtick graph) coked up to support it. Here’s just one paper published in the peer reviewed journal Energy and Environment:

Why scientists are skeptical about the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis

Here’a a little taster from the first paragraph:

Abstract: The strong climate-forcing effect of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations advocated by the IPCC, is at odds with climate developments during geological, historical and recent times. Although atmospheric CO2 concentrations continuously increased during industrial times, temperatures did not increase continuously to the present level but stagnated or even declined slightly during 1880 to 1900, 1945 to 1977 and again since 1998.

Total solar irradiation rose from a low in 1890 to a first peak in 1950 that was followed by a sharp decline ending in 1977, giving way to a period of rapidly increasing radiation peaking in 2002 when solar activity started to decrease, possibly declining to a new Little-Ice-Age type low.

The Greenhouse Effect of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations, claimed and widely propagated by IPCC, is particularly vexing as it is widely over-estimated without adequate scientific justification. Large observed climate variations documented for geological and historical times, as well as the lack of insight into the behaviour of complex systems, seriously question the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) concept propagated by the IPCC.

The climate variability during industrial times was essentially governed by changes in solar activity with increasing atmospheric CO2 content playing a subordinate role.

Bit of an eye opener if you are used to seeing the claims of lying liars who tell you no “respectable” scientists disagree with the idea that Anthopogenic Global Warming is due to carbon dioxide emitted by business and domestic energy use.

But finally, in an old article for Times Of India SWAMINATHAN S ANKLESARIA AIYAR nails the truth of that alleged almost complete scientific consesus in support of CO2 driven AGW:

Greens say, rightly, that the best scientific assessment today is that global warming is occurring. Yet never in history have scientists accurately predicted what will happen 100 years later. A century ago no scientists predicted the internet, microwave ovens, TV, nuclear explosions or antibiotics. It is impossible, even stupid, to predict the distant future.

That scientific truth is rarely mentioned. Why? Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.

The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals. It is no co-incidence that so many scientists sceptical of global warming are retired professors: they have no need to chase research grants and chairs.

As The Daily Stirrer has always said, if you want to get to the truth of anything, just follow the money.

RELATED POSTS:
Climate Change And The Science Of Flogging Dead Horses
The science behind the climate change scare is now thoroughly discredited. So why do those who hoped to get rich or famous by promoting the alarmist and Warmageddonist case keep trying to beat some life back into the corpse?

In Spite Of The Scientific Evidence Piling Up against Them, Like True Cult Devotees, Warmageddonists Still Believe In The Carbon Dioxide
Below is a short list of all the global warming catastrpophes that we were promised would have happeneed by now (and anybody who said otherwise just didn’t understand the science). Well none of them have, mother earth does not take orders from mathematical models. Pathetically but rather touchingly the CAGWARTs as cult members are known, still believe In The Carbon Dioxide Monster
After Years Of Denial US Government Admits Geo – engineering experiment
Again the science academe have been exposed as a bunch of crooked, lying, self serving, sociopathic shits who will do anything for a research grant. After years of denials by scientists, universities and government departments it has finally been admitted that geoengineering experiments ale a likely cause of environmental chaos
Obama Tries To Revive Global Warming Debate As Advisers Warn Him’Avoid Economic Arguments’
Science is not one of Barack Obama’s strengths according to the man himself. But what is? Not making speeches as anyone who has listened to or read one of his speeches rather than reading the burblings of sycophantic journalists who reported it will know. If we looks at Obama’s latest speech on climate change it appears where he does excel is in pissing on his country’s constitution …
Climates and Lies: Another expose Of The Great Carbon Dioxide Lie
Another article exposing the lies of the climate change and environmental science lobby.
Global Warming Theory Debunked By NASA
NASA, America’s National Aeoronautical And Space Agency was in the forefront of the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare. Do you remember ‘The Science Is Settled’? Well it wasn’t, a trickle of those really awkward bastards who insist on thinking for themselves became a torrent and now even NASA are admitting it was all a hoax based on dodgy statistics and fraudulent physics.

Climate Change

RELATED POSTS:
How academic debate is suppressed on science topics like Climate Change, GMOs, Pesticides and Toxicity of medicines

Spinning The Climate

With fascist Lib Dem and Labour MPs trying to abolish free speech and press freedom to stop intelligent commentators exposing the great scam that was global warming and science tits getting more and more hysterical in their attempts to pretend that what is happening is not the exact opposite of everything they predicted, I found this interesting essay on how the deception was carried out.

SPINNING THE CLIMATE:
THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE
CHANGE (IPCC)
Vincent Gray

Here’s an extract from his introduction:

PREFACE
I have spent a lifetime on scientific research. My father was a working class intellectual, eager for knowledge. He took me to all the London museums and I remember a visit to the Royal Albert Hall to see the Exhibition which celebrated the discovery of Electromagnetic Induction by
Michael Faraday. This must have been 1931 when I was 9 years old. My secondary school in London, Latymer Upper, had top scientists, as the only job those days was teaching. I won a Major scholarship to Emmanuel College Cambridge and obtained a PhD degree from war work on flame thrower and incendiary bomb fuels.

I avoided academia as I wished to help industry, and over the years I had a range of jobs with industrial research organisations working on oil, protein, plastics, fibres, paint, adhesives, building, coal and forensic science in The UK, France, Canada and New Zealand. I published well over 100 scientific papers, several patents and several Chapters on books.

After retiring from my job in New Zealand in 1987 I worked for four and a half years in China on coal slurries. The colleges, in Hangzhou,and in Kunming,where I taught English during my last year, hadexcellent libraries of science journals in English.

I became interested in the Greenhouse Effect and gave several lectures on the subject in China. In a visit back to New Zealand in 1989 I was invited to comment on the drafts of the Supplement to the First Report (published 1992) that had been circulated to my former employer from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These comments were submitted, amongst others, by the Director, R.S Whitney. I submitted comments as a Reviewer for all of the subsequent IPCC Reports, including the Fifth
Report, which is now pending.

The IPCC is claimed by some to have provided evidence that the earth’s climate is harmed by changes in the atmospheric concentrations. of greenhouse gases. These claims are false. This report explains how dubious observations and some genuine science has been distorted and “spun” to support a global campaign to limit human emissions of certain greenhouse gases which has no scientific basis and no proven capacity to forecast future climate.

ENVIRONMENTAL RELIGION
Environmental religion believes that humans are destroying the “planet” and the “environment” and it requires reasons and evidence to j
ustify this belief. The movement became influential in the late 1960s. A number of local meetings led to the first United Nations Conference on the Environment in Stockholm in 1972. Successful attempts weremade to abolish pesticides, restrict economic development in many countries from restrictive laws and in 1988, the Montreal Protocol prohibited substances that deplete the ozone layer.

In the late 1970s the environmental movement began to adopt the theory that emissions of “greenhouse gases” were destr oying the earth by causing “global warming”.

THE LEAD – UP TO THE IPCC
There were several scares that misfired. The “Nuclear Winter”, (Turco et al 1983), based on computer models of a nuclear war, was shown to be a hoax. There arose a “shopping list” of “Man’s Impact on the Global Environment” (Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1971) with the preparation of a “short list” that could be exploited further. The earliest success arose from the discovery of the “ozone hole” (Molina and Rowlands 1974).who claimed that halocarbons in the stratosphere were destroying ozone and thus enhancing ultraviolet radiation.

The United Nations Environment Conference in Stockholm, 1972, acted on this claim and set up the machinery to ban the use of halocarbons with the Montreal Protocol which came into force on January 1st 1989.

There followed what amounts to a shopping list of supposed human effects on the environment which could be souped up to impose restrictions on human activity (MIT 1979). Prominent amongst these was the emissions of carbon dioxide from combustion of fossil fuels . Bert Bolin, the Swedish meteorologist was behind the World Climate Research Programme is 1979 and
several conferences in Villach, Austria.

The origins of the theory that so – called green house gases enhanced global temperature, and that additions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere would cause additional warming of the climate has recently been reviewed by Gray (2013). The idea was promoted in 1895 by the …Read all

And There’s More
This Iain Dale post is worth reading for itself but have a look at the comment thread to, it isn’t long but there are plenty of links cited to articles and scientific papers that prove “the science is settled” was always a big fat lie.

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeGreenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthAuthorGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribd

Ian Thorpe at Facebook

Brace Yourself For Solar Storms

About two years ago Little Nicky told you of a warning issued by the kind of people who occasionally raise their snouts from the trough of taxpayers’ money to look at the sun through radio telescopes.

They said we were entering a period of unusually high solar activity and ought to brace ourselves for trouble.

These people have also said solar activity was a far more likely cause of climate change that CO2 which only resulted in the CAGWARTs (Carbon, Anthropogenic Global Warming Alternative Reality Trolls turning up the volume on their whine machine to eleven.

So what kind of trouble might we be in for?

This kind of trouble.

Now it has to be said, this artice describes a worst case scenario, the events it warns of are possible but not probable.

But then, by the same criteria, all those doomsday predictions of CAGWART scientists (which very noticeably have not happened (Where did the UN’s 50 million global warming refugees go?)were always worst case scenario possibilities rather than certainties.

Still we did learn one valuable lesson from the Global Warming scare. Scientists cling just as tightly to the certainties offered by their religion as the believers in any traditional religion.

The Scientific Consensus That Didn’t Exist

The Scientific Consensus That Didn’t Exist

We all got fed up of hearing the two mantras of the global warming lobby a long time ago. To remind you, they were:

The science is settled.

and

Every respected scientist in the world supports the case for Anthropogenic Global Warming.

My friend and fellow member of the Really Awkward Buggars Union Graham Leah suspected this was not true as scientists scarcely agree on anything. So he did somne research on what respected scientists rather than government placemen media hacks have really been saying.

Bear in mind, we’re talking here about real scientists doing independent research in climate and environment related fiedls, not self serving bureaucrats of the United Nations IPCC,the self serving academics intent only on keeping their piggy snouts in the trough of taxpayers’ money or the empire building civil servants who just want bigger departments.

Researchers like:

Dr Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and UN-IPCC insider. NOT a sceptic of AGW to my knowledge

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography.

“Claims such as ‘2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous,” the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered “the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.”

or:

Dr Benjamin Santer, author of the 2007 IPCC report chapter on the detection of greenhouse warming – NOT A SCEPTIC of AGW to my knowledge.

“It’s unfortunate that many people read the media hype before they read the (IPCC report) chapter “on the detection of greenhouse warming.” I think the caveats are there. We say quite clearly that few scientists would say that the attribution issue [man-made climate change] is a done deal.

&

Dr Richard Lindzen (Atmospheric Scientist) Professor at MIT UN-IPCC Lead Author

“The consensus was reached before the research had even begun.”

“It’s not 2,500 people offering their consensus, I participated in that. Each person who is an author writes one or two pages in conjunction with someone else…but ultimately, it is written by representatives of governments, of environmental organizations like the Union of Concerned Scientists, and industrial organizations, each seeking their own benefit.”

&

Dr John Christy – Professor and Director of the Earth System Science Centre at the University of Alabama, Huntsville (also Alabama State Climatologist) UN IPCC Lead Author writes:

“I don’t see a catastrophe developing from our emissions into the air of what should be correctly identified as ‘plant food.'”

“Scepticism, a hallmark of science, is frowned upon. (I suspect the IPCC bureaucracy cringes whenever I’m identified as an IPCC Lead Author}. The tendency to succumb to group-think and the herd-instinct (now formally called the “informational cascade”) is perhaps as tempting among scientists as any group because we, by definition, must be the “ones who know” (from the Latin sciere, to know).”

&

Russia – Dr Yury Izrael, past UN IPCC Vice President, director of Global Climate and Ecology Institute, member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

“There is no proven link between human activity and global warming.”

&

USA – Dr. Charles Wax, past president of the American Association of State Climatologists.

“First off, there isn’t a consensus among scientists. Don’t let anybody tell you there is.”

Now Even The IPCC Admits CO2 Driven Global Warming Was A Scam

Now Even The IPCC Admits CO2 Driven Global Warming Was A Scam

Breaking news from the US – via Watts Up With That?: a leaked draft of the IPCC’s latest report AR5 admits what the brighter lights amongst us have ben saying for a very long time: that the case for CO2 driven, man-made global warming is looking more shaky all the time and that the sun plays a much more significant role in “climate change” than the “scientific consensus” of a billionaire, two baldie men and a bunch of rent – seekers has previously been prepared to accept.

Here’s the killer admission:
Many empirical relationships have been reported between GCR or cosmogenic isotope archives and some aspects of the climate system (e.g., Bond et al., 2001; Dengel et al., 2009; Ram and Stolz, 1999). The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism such as the hypothesized GCR-cloud link. We focus here on observed relationships between GCR and aerosol and cloud properties.

Why is this a game-changer? As the person who leaked the document explains, :
The admission of strong evidence for enhanced solar forcing changes everything. The climate alarmists can’t continue to claim that warming was almost entirely due to human activity over a period when solar warming effects, now acknowledged to be important, were at a maximum. The final draft of AR5 WG1 is not scheduled to be released for another year but the public needs to know now how the main premises and conclusions of the IPCC story line have been undercut by the IPCC itself.

Over to you, members of the Global Totalitarianism Cult.

We can all look forward a session of ROTFLOAO as we read their convoluted lies and ridiculous attempts to suggest that “one report does not disprove the case” (although if you remember it was one report from the IPCC on which the whole case was built).

We can be certain the responses will not include any apologies for the lies, misrepresentations, accusations that climate science sceptics are child murderers, mea culpa confessions of willful idiocy or admissions that those of us they said “can’t understand the science” were right all along because we did understand the science and saw right through the holes in it. No, I think it will be fear and panic spreading, scaremongering, rent – seeking, Nobel Prize grubbing business as usual for the great Climate Change Ponzi scheme. Because as Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals tells us, “The end always justifies the means,” and the end is advancing the Marxist global tyranny agenda.

New Evidence Proving The Planet Is Not Warming Proves The Planet Is Warming Say Climate Scientists

Oh what fun we have with those whacky and zany climate scientists. A new report on climate change and CO2 emissions reveals there has been no significant warming since 1997. This proves anthropogenic gloval warming is a more urgent and more dangerous threat, the cliamte science crooks and liars say before blaming the chinese for global cooling.
New Evidence Proving The Planet Is Not Warming Proves The Planet Is Warming Say Climate Scientists

Rising Seas Not Down To Climate Change

Interesting story today in The Daily Telegraph
Water Mining Prime Culprit For Rising Seas

Nowhere in the Maldives juts more than 10 feet above the Indian Ocean, making it extremely worried about sea level rise. Its president, Mohamed Nasheed, illustrated the point by holding a cabinet meeting under water in the run-up to last year’s Copenhagen summit.

But a new study shows that global warming is not the only cause of swelling seas. Much comes from “water mining” – the pumping of vast amounts of groundwater from beneath the earth, mainly to irrigate crops. This inevitably ends up in the oceans after it evaporates from farmland and comes down as rain.

The study which will be published in the next issue issue of Geophysics Research Letters – estimates that extraction of ground water for domestic and industrial use accounts for about 25% of sea-level rise around the world, the same as the melting ice from the glaciers outside Greenland and Antarctica.

Even more disturbing is the theory that increased pumping threatens food supplies. Underground reservoirs and aquifers are shrinking by more than 280 cubic kilometres a day, well over twice as much as in 1960. Nature cannot keep pace with the loss to replenish the levels of water tables. The enormous Ogallala acquifer – which underlies eight states in the USA, helping to grow food on which people in a hundred nations rely – is being drawn down by a three feet a year. How much of that is replenished by rainfall percolation? A mere inch.

Clearly then the blinkered focus of the climte ‘science’ lobby on carbon driven global warming has only served to divert attention from even more urgent and potentially catastrophic problems.

If the atmosphere does warm by as much as six degrees celsius by the end of the century as the most alarmist of doomsday prophets predict, it will not matter because we will all have died of thirst long before that. On the other hand once water shortages start causing millions of deaths thus relieving the pressure of overpopulation on the ecosystem nature will be able to start restoring the balance and the few humans who survive will rebuild civilisation.

Or we could all get the message now, ignore the scintists who are only the hired lackeys of big food, big oil and big money and all just do our best to consume less. There is nothing wrong with using a computer with a I.6 Ghz CPU if it does the job, we don’t have to throw out clothes because they are last year’s fashion and we should heed the old wisdom of the thrifty, buy cheap – buy twice.

All the science I have seen that claims to address his issue, all the statistics that are chanted like mantras and said to support the ‘science’ that was done with made up or manipulated data, all the crackpot geo-engineeering theories and all the carbon trading schemes are aimed at only one thing, not saving the planet but saving the unsustainable perpetual growth economic model.

More controversdalist blogging at The Daily Stirrer

RELATED POSTS:
Peccavimus

Climate Science and the objective scientific view

Though climate change alarmists claim that that “the science is settled” no longer holds water the arguments rage on. If anything they are getting more heated as the climate science lobby, knocked from the moral high grounds show their true colours. But more and more evidence is showing the climate change science was never settled and the global warming Armageddonists had built their whole case on very flimsy evidence.

Last week The Russell Report into the so called Climategate scandal reported that no evidence of dishonesty by scientific researchers at the University Of East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU) had been found.

The Global Warming Armageddonists immediately claimed this exonerated the CRU scientists and proved the scientific case for Anthropogenic Global Warming.

As Little Nicky has always said scientists are an excitable, emotional lot, terms like self-discipline, detachment and objectivity do not appear in their lexicon (unless they are talking about their critics of course. If it’s wearing a science label that proves it’s right is the first item of faith in the creed followed by The Church Of Scienceology zealots who contribute to “progressive left” control freak blogs and the science pages of The Guardian.

So are there any objective reviews of the climate change research in question? There are lots actually. Here are links to a few:
click here to find a link to the Max Plank Institute’s report This is the actual press release from the Max Planck Institute that was prinited in Science magazine on July 6

And here is an editorial from New Scientist that appeared under the title
Without Candour We Can’t Trust Climate Science.
. This report shows none of the three whitewash inquiries published so far have been required to offer an opinion on the quality of the scientific work.

Then there was the news story about the United States Department of Energy withdrawing funding from the CRU

And finally a story of how new research recently published into the way carbon behaves in the atmosphere throws doubt on the reliability of the mathematical modelling techniques used by the CRU.

If you want a more entertaining take on climate science you can read all this stuff summarized with humourous asides at The Daily Stirrer:
Climate Change Crooks and Liars
Max Planck Refudiates AGW Science

Now Science Superstar Max Planck Debinks Climate Science

One of the lies most often repeated by the Climate Science lobby is that ‘the science stands’ i.e. that no fault was found in the scientific work of the CRU. This is both true and a lie, true in that no fault was found, a lie because the reason no fault was found is that to examine the scientific work was outside the Russell panel’s terms of reference. This report features the Max Planck Institute’s take on climate science and the IPCC.
Follow the link to read full post and find links to Max Planck Institutes paper published in Science Mag. 6 July 2010
Climate Science Debunked By Science Superstar Max Planck.

RELATED POSTS:
Can Humans Cope With The Worst Disasters?

Nature Does Not Negotiate

When President Bush in refuting the Kyoto treaty supported by all the other leading industrial nations declared “the American lifestyle is not up for negotiation” he was telling his public what they wanted to hear. It would be wrong to blame him for that, after all it is what politicians do. But really somebody should take the American nation to one side and explain that nature does not negotiate. The Kyoto signatories were not ganging up to force the will of namby – pamby European liberals on the gun – totin’ Humvee drivin’ burger chompin’, god fearin’ folks who seem to congregate between the Appalachians and the Rockies, (OK, I know its not really quite like that but that is the impression given to the world by most of America’s media) they were trying to work out a way to save the planet for all of us and all our grandchildren. In order to do this we must set an example to the rapidly industrialising population giants of the third world in the hope that they do not make cars and air conditioning easily available to their vast numbers of citizens.
The reason for concern among the economic leaders is that climate change, which tame scientists in the pay of the polluting corporations still insist is not happening or at worst is the very gradual result of a natural cycle, is in fact happening at a much faster rate than even the worst pessimists predicted.
The religious right and the corporate community, two groups that seem increasingly indistinguishable, have their academic hirelings to claim that the dire consequences predicted for climate change are just examples of liberal scaremongering. I wonder if any of these ivory tower idiots have been down to Florida and asked around to see how the locals feel about global warming after being hit by four major hurricanes in less than a month last year as they brace themselves for a repeat performance?
Global warming is a misleading phrase of course and it is easy for the pseudo – scientists of the “opinions for sale” mob to dismiss the very genuine concerns of real environmentalists by conjuring up theories that suggest Alaska, Newfoundland and Scandinavia will bask in a climate similar to South California or southern Spain. That is very cosy and attractive of course but utterly wrong. Global warming does not mean we will all get a deep suntan sitting in the back yard in January as everywhere becomes warmer and more pleasant. The ecology is a finely balanced system. A sudden change of only one or two degrees in the yearly average can be catastrophic for food crops and animal life. For example, the mild winter of 2003/4 adversely affected the Blueberry crop in New England to such an extent that many small farmers in New Egland are faced serious financial problems this year. Blueberies are a luxury crop of course (unless your family income depends on the harvest) but the things we depend on for our staple diet will be affected too.
Continental weather systems are very sensitive to variations in climate. If the weather patterns of 2004 became embedded the great plains of the U.S.A. and Canada will start to experience a dustbowl effect like that which devastated the global economy in the nineteen – thirties. A similar situation will be created in central Europe, the wheatfields of Ukraine, Russia, Hungary and Poland will not supply the domestic market, there will be no surplus to sell to the world. Crop failures throughout Asia and Africa will make previous famines look like times of plenty. So that is a lot of hungry and displaced people to swell the number of the world’s poor and a lot less food to go around.
As the interior of each continental landmass becomes more arid coastal areas will simultaneously become wetter and experience greater extremes of weather. 200 mph hurricane storms will become run of the mill in Florida and the Caribbean while cities such as New York and Seattle will alternately swelter and freeze as seasonal changes become more intense. New Yorkers might not suffer bad weather though, the city is low lying and the rise in sea levels caused by the melting of polar icecaps will lead to the inundation of the Big Apple along with New Orleans, London, Amsterdam, Calcutta and the historical jewel Venice. Most of the islands in the Gulf of Mexico will go as will the Maldives and a number of Pacific archipelagos. This will not happen in a Biblical flood but over several decades (it has been happening throughout the twentieth century.
“No Worries,” New Yorkers may think, “we can all move to California where the hills rise up sharply from the coast”. Around thirty million Californians think “great, our properties will rocket in value.” Unfortunately it is not that easy. Global warming is not just about parching summers and polar winters, desert creep and rising seas. There is the ice – cap bounce to think of.
If you are not familiar with this term take a child’s rubber ball and compress the top and bottom. As the poles are pushed in see how it bulges somewhere else to compensate. Now take off the pressure and the ball returns to its spherical shape. This is exactly what happens to our planet in an ice age.
We do not really know the extent of the southern ice cap twenty thousand years ago but we do know the in northern hemisphere the glacier was hundreds, in places thousands of feet thick and extended as far south as Minnesota in North America, covered the Alpine mountains reaching almost to the Mediterranean Sea in Europe and extended into northern India. That is a lot of ice pushing the north pole downwards. To complete the pictire, sea levels were nearly 500 feet lower then. That is a lot less water pressing on the equator to help it hold its shape. Planetary crust is not as springy as rubber ball stuff and so the rebound takes thousands of years. Some, but not all, earthquakes we experience today are due to that action. The faster the remaining ice melts the more frequent and violent those quakes will become and areas that are geologically unstable will be most vulnerable. So perhaps California is not a good location on which to base long term plans.
As if all that bad news is not enough to spend a lifetime worrying about there is the effect of warming on the oceans. Remember El Nino a few years ago. As the Pacific Ocean warms that phenomenon will become an annual weather feature while in the Atlantic Ocean the flow of the Gulf Stream that is so important to climatic stability in Europe and North America will slow allowing the Gulf and the Caribbean to get warmer while the North Atlantic cools. These conditions will devastate fish stocks in many nations that depend heavily of fish for food. Most of North America will become what geographers describe as “an area inhospitable to humans.”
The timescale for all this is not centuries as the complacent advocates of free market economics insist, but decades, we have perhaps only one or two decades, five at the most before we reach the tipping point beyond which we will not be able to do anything to arrest the trends towards rapid climate change.
Of course the money men and the God – squad dismiss all of this as liberal scaremongering. If we all say our prayers, concentrate on the serious business of getting rich and put our faith in God and our corporate and political masters everything will be just fine.
Of course everything I have written is informed speculation based on study of trends over fifty years, I can’t actually promise it will all happen but do you seriously want me to be able to promise these things will happen? Bizarrely though, as if some external agency is trying to back up my warnings, in between my starting to draft this article and completing it a report has been released confirming (again) that carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are rising far more quickly than was thought. If anybody still thinks it is safe to ignore the scientific evidence let me give you an analogy to illustrate our predicament.
You have all been to a convention and are in a bus on the way home and I am your driver, we are on a narrow and winding mountain road. Visibility is terrible, the driving rain is turning to snow, high winds batter our vehicle and the road surface is getting slippery. “Don’t worry,” I tell you, “I know the road well, there is some risk but so long as we go very slowly and carefully and allow for the conditions we should all have a good chance of getting home safely if somewhat late.”
“That’s outrageous,” a businessman yells, “time is money and every minute we waste is income lost. We are your customers and have a contract with you to get us home on time, road conditions are not our problem so hit it mister because if we are one minute late I’m going to sue.”
“Quite right” a politician chips in, “why should these people be inconvenienced. By buying a ticket they voted for you Mr. Driver and you have a duty to deliver their expectations. If you could not guarantee a safe and speedy journey then you should not be in business.”
Then a Padre stands, holds up a Bible and pointing at me yells in a voice like cola bottles being crushed “Oh thou of little faith, if it is God’s will that we get home then he will clear the road and guide our bus but if He has decreed it is Our Time then you blaspheme by trying to change destiny.
At that point I seriously think of jumping out of the moving bus, but that would not be fair to the sane majority so I turn to you and ask “what do you want me to do, drive as safely as I can and have a very good chance of getting us all home or drive like an idiot and hope that maybe, if we are lucky, a few of us will survive the inevitable crash?”
Hypothetical maybe, but sooner or later we have to stop and ask ourselves “what is more important, lifestyle options or our childrens’ and grandchildrens’ lives?

END