I don’t get here enough these days, but Populis seem to be getting on top of things, they certainly got rid of the span site penalty, and traffic is going up. So perhaps it’s time Little Nicky Machievelli had a news lease of life:
Here’s something I posted under my Arthur Foxake alter ego:
Despite The Science Being Discredited Mainsteam Media Still Plugs Climate Scare
by Arthur Foxake
Just take a look at this great, steaming heap of bullshit from CNN and ask yourself why anyone watches a channel owned by a billionaire elitist who has openly said he thinks the global population should be reduced from 7 billion to 350 million. It’s a no brainer that the output from any news channel owned by a Nazi shit like Ted Turner is not going to report real news but pump out propaganda designed to brainwash you.
See below what I mean:
(CNN) — Average annual temperatures will start to consistently exceed the highest levels previously recorded in as little as seven years in tropical hotspots and within four decades for the majority of the globe if nothing is done to stop climate change, according to a new study published Thursday in the journal Nature. And by the end of the century, monthly average temperatures will be higher than at any time since at least 1860, according to the study, led by University of Hawaii geographer Camilo Mora.
The effects will be felt first in tropical climates, with the annual temperature range rising beyond the historical range in Manokwari, Indonesia, in 2020, according to a map that accompanies the study on the University of Hawaii website.
Mexico City’s date is 2031. It’s 2046 in Orlando, and a year later in Washington and New York, according to the group. Anchorage, Alaska, doesn’t climb on board until 2071.
“The results shocked us. Regardless of the scenario, changes will be coming soon,” Mora said in a statement posted by the university. “Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”
Read full story from CNN if your reading of choice is fairy tales.
What makes Little Nicky laugh is the confidence these guys have in their predictions for fifty years ahead when they can’t even forecast next weeks weather accurately most of the time
But if you could not be arsed reading the pseudo – scientific bullshit in the CNN item, just take a look at one statement in there that shows what a pack of scaremongering lies this is.
“Monthly average temperatures will be higher than at any time since at least 1860”
So these pseudo scientists, these research grant troughers are so determined to keep their piggy snouts in the swill they make up an idiotic and blatant lie to support their scaremongering.
Hotter than any time since 1860? It is conveniently just before meaningful temperature records began to be kept but if we look at the history books or newspaper archives for 1860 there are no reports of mass extinction, of millions of people starving because crops had withered in parched fields. In fact the average temperature since records began (around 150 years ago)shows a statistical increase of 0.4 of a degree.
Four tenths of a degree in 150 years. At that rate it will be six hundred years before we hit that two degree increase that scientists(but nobody else)thinks is so critical. Surely if these scientists are as clever as they would like us to think, they can devise a faster way to wipe out humanity.
And why would they want to wipe out humanity, you might well ask. Because they can of course, they’re scientists so that’s the only reason they ever need to inflict harm on their fellow humans.
Meanwhile back on Planet Reality
A Record-Setting Blizzard Killed 75,000 Cows and You Might Not Have Even Heard About It
Ranchers are still digging out thousands of their cattle that became buried in a record-setting snowstorm in South Dakota USA late last week and over the weekend. One would think the death of 75,000 cattle caused by upwards of five feet of snow so early in the autumn might get some national attention, or even warrant a world news report in Europe and elsewhere but as one blogger observed, it has taken some time for the news of the precipitation massacre to reach outside of local media.
Well of course, they are usually keen to report climate change but this is the wrong sort of climate change.
Read more on this story
Snow reaches mailboxes about four feet above ground in South Dakota
Little Nicky has warned of the replacement of news with propaganda since we started in 2005. People are waking up and relying on alternative news to learn what is really going on. And is it any wonder when traditional media offers us nothing but the bullsit shovelled out by their political masters. Bullshit like this:
Mainstream media all on board latest global warming fear-and-panic bandwagon after IPCC / New World Order report release.
from Natural News:
“Man-made, human-produced carbon dioxide is filling up the atmosphere, heating it to unsustainable temperatures that will ultimately melt the polar ice caps and flood the world.”
Thats the latest fear-mongering report from the United Nations International Panel on Climate Change. Only, none of that is true, as other climatologists and experts, including those at NASA reported as early as a few years ago.
Of course, none of this makes much difference to the New World Order (Not a real organization but a derogatory reference to those political groups, businesses and academics intent on promoting the idea that only a global, totalitarian government can ave humankind.) owned alarmist mainstream media, most of which has bought into and reported verbatim disproven nonsense regarding nonexistent global warming crises that is still being espoused from people like former Vice President Al Gore, whose own predictions of melting polar caps have been seriously debunked.”
Read more at Natural News
An incomplete list of scientists challenging the idea that global warming is caused solely by Carbon Dioxide emissions generated by human activity can be found at this wikipedia page. A warning however, Wikipedia can be edited by people with an agenda and this page repeats the misleading claim that 97 per cent of scientific papers support the global warming case.
In fact though the majority (not 97%, the authors of the meta analysis referred to assumed the support for their case of scientists who acknowledged that climate change was a problem did not express an opinion on the cause) support the probability that human activity has some imact on the climate, Carbon Dioxide was not identified as the sole cause, some citing deforestation, urbanisation and overpopulation as more significant factors.
According to this report in Forbes magazine the American business news publication only thirty six percent of 1077 scientists surveyed support the carbon Dioxide theory with a large majority suggesting the causes of the slight increase in global mean temperature are natural.
We can find any amount of level headed, objective research and analysis showing that the majority of independent scientists are highly sceptical of the Carbon Dioxide case and the bogus evidence (e.g. the notorious hockey schtick graph) coked up to support it. Here’s just one paper published in the peer reviewed journal Energy and Environment:
Why scientists are skeptical about the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis
Here’a a little taster from the first paragraph:
Abstract: The strong climate-forcing effect of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations advocated by the IPCC, is at odds with climate developments during geological, historical and recent times. Although atmospheric CO2 concentrations continuously increased during industrial times, temperatures did not increase continuously to the present level but stagnated or even declined slightly during 1880 to 1900, 1945 to 1977 and again since 1998.
Total solar irradiation rose from a low in 1890 to a first peak in 1950 that was followed by a sharp decline ending in 1977, giving way to a period of rapidly increasing radiation peaking in 2002 when solar activity started to decrease, possibly declining to a new Little-Ice-Age type low.
The Greenhouse Effect of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations, claimed and widely propagated by IPCC, is particularly vexing as it is widely over-estimated without adequate scientific justification. Large observed climate variations documented for geological and historical times, as well as the lack of insight into the behaviour of complex systems, seriously question the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) concept propagated by the IPCC.
The climate variability during industrial times was essentially governed by changes in solar activity with increasing atmospheric CO2 content playing a subordinate role.
Bit of an eye opener if you are used to seeing the claims of lying liars who tell you no “respectable” scientists disagree with the idea that Anthopogenic Global Warming is due to carbon dioxide emitted by business and domestic energy use.
But finally, in an old article for Times Of India SWAMINATHAN S ANKLESARIA AIYAR nails the truth of that alleged almost complete scientific consesus in support of CO2 driven AGW:
Greens say, rightly, that the best scientific assessment today is that global warming is occurring. Yet never in history have scientists accurately predicted what will happen 100 years later. A century ago no scientists predicted the internet, microwave ovens, TV, nuclear explosions or antibiotics. It is impossible, even stupid, to predict the distant future.
That scientific truth is rarely mentioned. Why? Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals. It is no co-incidence that so many scientists sceptical of global warming are retired professors: they have no need to chase research grants and chairs.
As The Daily Stirrer has always said, if you want to get to the truth of anything, just follow the money.
RELATED POSTS:
Climate Change And The Science Of Flogging Dead Horses
The science behind the climate change scare is now thoroughly discredited. So why do those who hoped to get rich or famous by promoting the alarmist and Warmageddonist case keep trying to beat some life back into the corpse?
In Spite Of The Scientific Evidence Piling Up against Them, Like True Cult Devotees, Warmageddonists Still Believe In The Carbon Dioxide
Below is a short list of all the global warming catastrpophes that we were promised would have happeneed by now (and anybody who said otherwise just didn’t understand the science). Well none of them have, mother earth does not take orders from mathematical models. Pathetically but rather touchingly the CAGWARTs as cult members are known, still believe In The Carbon Dioxide Monster
After Years Of Denial US Government Admits Geo – engineering experiment
Again the science academe have been exposed as a bunch of crooked, lying, self serving, sociopathic shits who will do anything for a research grant. After years of denials by scientists, universities and government departments it has finally been admitted that geoengineering experiments ale a likely cause of environmental chaos
Obama Tries To Revive Global Warming Debate As Advisers Warn Him’Avoid Economic Arguments’
Science is not one of Barack Obama’s strengths according to the man himself. But what is? Not making speeches as anyone who has listened to or read one of his speeches rather than reading the burblings of sycophantic journalists who reported it will know. If we looks at Obama’s latest speech on climate change it appears where he does excel is in pissing on his country’s constitution …
Climates and Lies: Another expose Of The Great Carbon Dioxide Lie
Another article exposing the lies of the climate change and environmental science lobby.
Global Warming Theory Debunked By NASA
NASA, America’s National Aeoronautical And Space Agency was in the forefront of the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare. Do you remember ‘The Science Is Settled’? Well it wasn’t, a trickle of those really awkward bastards who insist on thinking for themselves became a torrent and now even NASA are admitting it was all a hoax based on dodgy statistics and fraudulent physics.
Climate Change
RELATED POSTS:
How academic debate is suppressed on science topics like Climate Change, GMOs, Pesticides and Toxicity of medicines
Little Nicky Machiavelli 