As A Climate Science Sceptic I’ve Often Been Asked Why We Sceptics Do Not Present Our Findings For Peer Review?

It might seem like a reasonable question until you see that the climate science academy bears a strong resemblence to a religious cult. Challenge the warming narrative and hooded figures bearing burning crosses will crawl out from under stones and logs, pointing bony fingers at you and shouting, “Heretic, burn him!”

And that’s just how established figures in the climate research community are treated. Lay people like me, who challenge the narrative on Warmageddon, In my case on the lunacy of environmentalist economics, others on the areas in which they have expertise, are simply ignored. Like fundamentalist Christians, Warmageddonists hold a literal faith in the words of the Phophet Mann to whom the wisdom of The Great Hockey Stich was handed down on a tablet computer. Trouble is The Great Hockey Stick and its now discredited prophet Michael Mann are about as reliable as the ancient scriptures of a God invented by a middle eastern Bronze Age tribe of nomadic, semi – literate goat shaggers.

Here’s a real scientist giving is views on climate science in response to a question on Quora. My qualifications, in Sociology and Economics, are valid enough in their field but are pseudo – sciences.

Why don’t skeptics present their evidence to climate scientists?

Paul Noel, former Research Scientist 6 Level 2 UAH Huntsville Al. (2009-2014)

Answered 10h ago

Well here is an example: If I present to you the simple facts that a greenhouse does 2 jobs, it blocks the movement of air by convection and wind and it provides a selective frequency mirror for IR. Then if I present proof which is plain up simple that no gas on this earth does either job therefore there is NO SUCH THING as a GREENHOUSE GAS, which is prima facie true and that means 100% of the claims for Carbon Dioxide retaining heat on this earth as a “greenhouse gas” are fake on the face of them, you would see all the “Climate Scientists” deny my statement but it is very much true.

Then if I pulled out any number of IR Photos which clearly illuminate images through many miles of atmosphere like across the Los Angeles Basin which would be impossible if CO2 actually blocked or absorbed IR like is proposed they would still deny my statement.

Yet here is such a photograph showing methane absorbing but the background through CO2 5 to 20 times the vertical amount in the atmosphere due to distance still resolves. Then if I bring out a scientific paper that shows that Industry Experts: CO2 Worse Than Useless in Trapping Heat/Delaying Cooling | PSI Intl . Do I get recognized? NO!

What’s the matter here. The “Climate Scientists” are clearly liars as this picture with the EDF logo is impossible if CO2 is a problem.

Look at reality. You don’t need a “scientist” to tell you what you clearly see here. There is no greenhouse gas even in Methane as it is not reflecting IR, it is absorbing IR. (Black in the picture) and no IR absorption by the CO2 in 25 miles of air. I know how far the LA basin is across and in places it is 80 miles! This picture is about 25 miles across. I have flown into this area in a small plane.

Simple reality is no gas on this earth does any function of a greenhouse and the alleged greenhouse gases are in fact counter productive in function that they are claimed to do. “What was discovered was that under stringent lab conditions it can be shown that regular air delays/traps heat better than greenhouse gases such as CO2!” – article cited above. Maybe you need to see the facts and quit looking to experts.

MORE from Greenteeth Digital Publishing on Climate Change

 

Ruling Elites support Extinction Rebellion plan for Marxist world to ‘fight climate change’

There is No Climate Emergency Say 500 Climate Scientists