Truth About The Great Swine Flu Conspiracy

The message from the World Health Organisation was clear – we are all going to die from swine flu. It spreads fast, it is dangerous, and it coming here. “But there is a way to save yourself,” the science whore and theor corporate paymasters told is, just get a flu shot (any flu shot, it didn’t matter if it was not for the right strain) and purchase a Big Pharma quack remedy for the deadly virus and the science whores and their corporate punters will save you.

The WHO now finds itself looking for a remedy for embarrassment as more and more scientists, health researchers, and even science journalists (the cheapest whores of all, offering the equivalent of a tuppenny upright round the back of the lab, are starting to question the organization’s motives behind raising the alert so quickly. Since then, research by responsible individuals (i.e. not funded by Big Pharma) has found the H1N1 flu strain (Swine Flu) was never a danger to humans.

According to the Danish Daily Information newspaper, the WHO and pharmaceutical companies are suffering from the profit bug. Or, to put it simply, the chief health care organization in the world has teamed up with the drug makers to create a phantom monster – and to rake in cash by selling a remedy for it.’

Truth About The Great Swine Flu Conspiracy

RELATED POSTS:

Is the World Health Organization involved in biological warfare research?
Dr. Francis Boyle, a professor of international law, talked in a recent interview with about the Wuhan coronavirus now sweeping through the far east, laboratory in Wuhan, China, where the genetically modified virus appears to have originated, and the World Health Organization’s (WHO) clandestine involvement in biological warfare research …Continue reading

Mad Science: The Human Nightmare Continues

Hardly a day goes by without a new story about the insane, sociopathic, control freak plans and projects being hatched by scientists to help The New World Order do what? Kill most of us so they can have the big, beautiful world to themselves, enslave is so they, “The Controllers” can live in a Brave New World in which a tiny elite rule over a massive population of what Aldous Huxley in his novel Brave New World dubbed semi-morons? Increase they wealth and power because these elitists are hoplessly hooked on the most potent drug known to humanity, power?

All I can be sure of is my recent invention, The Orwell – Huxley – Dick Dystopianometer which measures social decay on a scale of one to ten creeps a little higher every day, and the needle is getting perilously close to eleven.

One of the favourite toys scientists currently like to play with is nanoparticles:

from Waking Times

One of the latest trends in manufacturing for today’s consumer products is the use of engineered nano-particles (ENP’s), yet, most people have no idea that they are consuming and absorbing ENP’s. Research is discovering that certain ENP’s may be toxic and extremely harmful to human health, causing cell and DNA damage, potentially leading to the development of cancers.

Nano-particles are microscopically sized particles with at least one dimension less than 100 nano-meters (nm). To put this in perspective, a sheet of paper is about 100,000 nm thick, and a strand of human DNA is about 2.5 nm thick. A current trend in research and development, ENP’s are generating widespread interest for their potential to enhance consumer materials and food products, and for their potential applications in the electronic, optical and biomedical fields. “Nanoparticles are of great scientific interest as they are effectively a bridge between bulk materials and atomic or molecular structures.”

Read more at Waking Times

One project currently in development by Google (“Don’t be evil, that’s our job”) is to create a daily pill we will swallow to dose ourselves with nanomaterials capable of interfacing our brains and with Google’s server centres. It’s probably too far fetched to ever succeed but the fact that these mad bastards are taking it seriously shows the threat they pose to our very humanity.

What should concern us; no, what should have us screaming “ENOUGH ALREADY” is that while the scientists who whore themselves to Big Pharma and corporate money are pressing ahead full speed with this, having not paused to give one nanoseconds thought to the possible adverse consequences of introducing this shit into our bodies, a lot of intelligent and responsible independent researchers have very serious concerns on that score.

HAARP: Have Scientists Opened Pandora’s Box With Experiments In Changing The Climate

What do you think of the freak weather this year? Coincidence, climate change, solar activity or something more sinister. If you have heard the term HAARP chances are you’re pretty sceptical about the official line. HAARP – the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program is a research programme that experiments with changing the earh’s upper atmosphere. you don’t have to understand much science to realise it proves that, as John Lennon said, the world is run by insane people doing insane things.

Read all HAARP Pandora’s Box

HAARP: Scientists Open Pandora’s Box With Experiments In Changing The Climate

RELATED POSTS:
Beam Me Up Brian* – Scientists Say Star Trek Style Teleporation Is Possible
Conspiracy Theorists Vindicated: HAARP Confirmed Weather-manipulation Tool
Modern Maths Teaching Is Making Children Mentally Ill
Missing Malaysian Aircraft: Crash Or Cover Up?
Quantum Metaphysics
The Island Of Hy Brasil – Another Atlantis or Insula Mirabilis

Fake Science

some of Little Nicky’s most viewed and most commented blog posts over the years have been our exposures of the hypocrisy and dishonesty of those geeks who call themselves scientists. Their sacred cows were slaughtered, the infallibility of statistics was show to be a case of “if you torture data enough it will give you the answer you wanted, and the semi divine ‘peer review process’ was revealed as a “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours, bit of Chimpery.

Oh the hatred and opprobrium that was hurled at Little Nicky. Still we did learn from it that when their research grants are threatened scientists revert to a primitive state (well the poor little buggers are not very evolved) and start hurling abuse like chimps throwing turds at intruders. Well they are CHIMPS of course, Completely Hopeless In Most Practical Situations.

Little Nicky was right of course, though it always take the world a while to catch up. Many of those “peer reviewed scientific papers” are nothing but a fraud. Take a look at this from world truth

“Like all the best hoaxes, there was a serious point to be made. Three MIT graduate students wanted to expose how dodgy scientific conferences pestered researchers for papers, and accepted any old rubbish sent in, knowing that academics would stump up the hefty, till-ringing registration fees.

It took only a handful of days. The students wrote a simple computer program that churned out gobbledegook and presented it as an academic paper. They put their names on one of the papers, sent it to a conference, and promptly had it accepted. The sting, in 2005, revealed a farce that lay at the heart of science.

But this is the hoax that keeps on giving. The creators of the automatic nonsense generator, Jeremy Stribling, Dan Aguayo and Maxwell Krohn, have made the SCIgen program free to download. And scientists have been using it in their droves. This week, Nature reported, French researcher Cyril Labbé revealed that 16 gobbledegook papers created by SCIgen had been used by German academic publisher Springer. More than 100 more fake SCIgen papers were published by the US Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). Both organisations have now taken steps to remove the papers.”

Read full article at The Guardian

You gotta laugh haven’t you? Until you count how much money we are throwing at these lying, cheating bell ends.

Science and technology

If We Do Not Act Global Cooling Will Kill Millions

I’m fed up of telling you … so here’s something from The Daily Sheeple for all the fools who still believe in the omnipotence and infallibity of the almighty Hockey Stick

“Climate change is a way of raising money for governments that just won’t admit they were wrong. It’s a way of taxing us to the point where we can barely afford to put food on the table. It’s a way of instilling fear into children, installing the ‘problems’ in their impressionable minds so that they grow up accepting and not questioning that global warming is an issue.

The change of title from global warming to climate change was subtle. It was a change that was designed to cover all bases. The term global warming signifies just that, that the world is warming. We know it isn’t, it’s cooling. The data bears this out and has done so for the last decade. When the warming stopped back in 1998 it created a problem for our fraudster government, along with all other governments that had bought into the global warming hype. How could they call a problem global warming when the world had actually stopped warming?

For a couple of years there was a hiatus, the Earth stayed roughly where it was, and then the cooling began, and the term climate change came into popular usage, particularly by politicians.

There is nothing wrong with believing the science of the day. Looking back it did indeed appear that the planet was heating up…i

Read more at The Daily Sheeple:

Is This The End For The Climate Science Scam?

Little Nicky and his friends at Boggart Blog and The Daily Stirrer have told you so many times that the whole Anthropogenic Global Warming scare was a government – academic scam. “The science is settled,” the evil, coneheaded wonks screamed.

Fuck the science, look at the flaws in the junior school level arithmetic, little Nicky taunted. What to know who was right, look at this:

from Principia Scientific

“A newly-uncovered and monumental calculating error in official US government climate data shows beyond doubt that climate scientists unjustifiably added on a whopping one degree of phantom warming to the official “raw” temperature record. Skeptics believe the discovery may trigger the biggest of all “climate con” scandals in Congress and sound the death knell on American climate policy.

Independent data analyst, Steven Goddard, today (January 19, 2014) released his telling study of the officially adjusted and “homogenized” US temperature records relied upon by NASA, NOAA, USHCN and scientists around the world to “prove” our climate has been warming dangerously.

Goddard reports, “I spent the evening comparing graphs…and hit the NOAA motherlode.” His diligent research exposed the real reason why there is a startling disparity between the “raw” thermometer readings, as reported by measuring stations, and the “adjusted” temperatures, those that appear in official charts and government reports. In effect, the adjustments to the “raw” thermometer measurements made by the climate scientists “turns a 90 year cooling trend into a warming trend,” says the astonished Goddard.”

endquote

Read full article: New Climate Data Rigging Scandal Rocks US Government

Be interesting to see how the neo – fascists at the BBC spin this one, especially the anti – democracy shits on the Radio 4 Today programme. After all, the global warming scare was the foundation of the globalist push for totalitarian world government.

RELATED POSTS:
The Bloggies (Blogosphere Oscars) cancel science category because the wrong people keep winning.
Climate Predictions, Economics and Realities
Wind farms: Is Common Sense Breaking Out In The Warmageddonist Industry?

Told You So, Wind Turbines Are Shoddy, Short – life Crap

You know how they sold us wind turbines (well they didn’t sell the idea to some of us who understand the engineering, we were just called swivel eyed nut jobs and told to fuck off)An article at Billo The Wisp blog, if confirmed, will bear out those of us who told you Wind Turbines were just a scam aimed at letting the trougher fathers and father-in-laws of certain politicians keep their piggy snouts in the never ending swill of taxpayers money.

“Turbine gearbox failures apparently happen typically after 5-7 years rather than the 20 years that we are normally led to believe they last for ( . Moreover, their failure can be completely catastrophic, leading to the destruction of the whole turbine” Wind Turbines, the ghost in the gearbox – billo the wisp. )

Billo has discovered that a group of US scientists commissioned by Washington to look into the problem, have as yet failed to come up with any reason for the trubines falling short of expectations or propose any solution since they started work in 2007. Can’t see what science has to do with it myself, wouldn’t they be better employing mechanical engineers?

Imagine how you would feel if you paid £25,000 ($40,000) for a car and it’s engine failed after 30,000 miles. So why do we accept this crap just because something has an “Approved by scientists and politicians” label stuck on it.

RELATED POSTS:
Major Disaster Neeeded To Save The New World Order? What!

Science Guy To Debate With Creationist

from The Raw Story

The former children’s television host and outspoken critic of creationist teaching will discuss whether the Bible-based version of Earth’s origins is a viable model Feb. 4 at the museum in Petersburg, Kentucky.

The debate starts at 7 p.m., and tickets will cost $25.

Ham, the president and CEO of Answers in Genesis, said he was excited to face off against Nye.

“It’s quite rare these days for such a well-known evolutionist to publicly debate a creationist – so we do expect a lot of media interest,” Ham said on his Facebook page.

But not everyone is thrilled by the idea.

Matt Young, blogging at The Panda’s Thumb, urged Nye to reconsider his participation, saying that it legitimized creationism.

“There is nothing to debate, and a ‘debate’ with Mr. Nye will only give Mr. Ham credibility that he does not deserve and increase not only his visibility but also his ability to attract investors,” Young wrote.

The blogger noted the example of Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt, who has said she refuses to participate in events with Holocaust deniers.

“I sometimes bowdlerize that to ‘I do not debate liars,’ and it is a policy I recommend to anyone who is tempted to ‘debate’ a creationist,” Young wrote. “Whether you win or lose, you will convince no one and will only add to the prominence of your opponent, who can now say, ‘See, I debated a prominent scientist; I must be taken seriously now.’”

I have read through the comments on this thread and can’t see why this raises such debate. Looking at it from a social perspective it would appear that the story in Genesis of how it all came into existence is no different from that which science describes (God according to religious texts being unknowable could be described as a singularity). True the bible refers to days but that was a bit creative but served to keep bronze age, tent dwelling goat molesters happy about the whole thing. They would have found hundreds of millions of years for each stage too difficult to comprehend.

What I find difficult to understand is how people can be so closed to the propositions put forward from each side. Absolute proof would deny faith and as we know religion relies on faith. My only argument is how a god or super-architect would design something (us) that destroyed his supposed greatest creation (us). There are creatures and diseases that rob innocent children of life, and of the ability to enjoy and wonder at what surrounds them. So why would that happen, spite? Vindictiveness? Ineptitude?

I once asked my RI teacher at school to explain why God would allow the death and suffering of innocent children in the floods of the 60’s that wiped out so many in East Pakistan, I did not get an answer that made any sense. Since then I have asked the same or similar questions of those who profess to lead on religious matters, they could not provide an answer that could explain why such things should happen. Now if they can’t explain why such fundamental things happen and how they fit into the whole argument of religion and what a deity does then how are we to listen to them argue for creationism.

I believe that every individual has the right to believe in whatever they want to as long as it doesn’t interfere with the same rights of any other individual. Believe in what you want but don’t try and foist those beliefs on others. I for one believe that we should teach as many different perspectives on this subject as possible because knowledge is power, whereas indoctrination only fosters hate and bigotry

As a great man said at the end of his television show, “May your god go with you”

Here are some further comments:
anonymouslyme13
• 2 days ago

The winner of this debate is going to be purely a matter of individual perspective so it is an exercise in futility but I would bet it will be entertaining as hell. I never understood why creationism and evolution weren’t compatible for Christians. I mean do they know how their God allegedly created the earth? Do they know how long his days were? I would think, from my unfortunate experience with the religion, that for a Christian, the height of arrogance would be to assume you know exactly how it was done. I know there would be discrepencies but they seem to be able to “prove” anything they want with the Bible depending on what they feel like on any given day so I’m sure they could figure something out to account for those.

Roxee Jerusha
• 13 hours ago

The reason why evolution continues to be attacked is because the most fundamentalist of religious people, those who still read and believe what the bible actually says as opposed to the rest of the faithful who don’t read it and/or puck and chhose from it, realise that the truth of evolution renders the story of Adam and Eve as myth. Meaning there was no original sin, so no fall from grace, and ultimately no need for anyone to have their life sacrificed to secure forgiveness for humanity. Simplistically, Jesus’ resurection story is also rendered as myth by the truth of evolution and what that means for the foundational beliefs of christianity.

•
Reply
•
Share ›

Avatar
Chris Powell Jerusha
• a day ago

Oh, please… Consider Euclid’s postulates from which a vast plane geometry is constructed. No God or god invoked anywhere. Using this geometry great buildings were built, bridges thrown up and ships launched – and who knows what else. Then Galileo rolling balls down slopes of different angles to form dynamic physics. No God or god invoked there either. And Maxwell with his awesome laws on electromagnetism which prompted Einstein’s special relativity. At no point was a God or god assumed. All that science without a supernatural being in sight!

RELATED POSTS:
The First humans From Australia Not Africa?

Saturated fat is healthy for us, but not for food industry profits

Once again the medical science community are caught serving their corporate paymasters rather than the punters whose trust and respect they demand. Science was ever fascism’s whore.

Another doctor working on independent research into cardio vascular disease produces a report showing saturated fat is not the cause of obesity, heart attacks and strokes. The real problem lies in highly refined sugars and carbohydrates and the processed fats sold to us as health foods in the form of “low fat spreads”.

Read more:
Saturated fat is healthy for us, but not for food industry profits

3D Printing Continues the Evolution of the Humanoid Robot

This is an update to the ongoing mission of psycho scientists to replace humans with robots.

In the age of computers, things evolve exponentially. In just a few generations robots have gone from a scientific fantasy, to a playful curiosity, to entering the battlefield to replace and/or augment their human counterparts.

We are already at the point where we have to consider what the next step of robotic evolution looks like. According to robotics engineers, it appears that at some point in the near future the next step could very well be whatever the next generation robot chooses for itself.

The humanoid robot is now poised to take a leap from a mere facsimile of human behavior to one that futurists suggest will not only walk like a human, but will possess self awareness, as well as a full range of high-tech computational spectrum analysis and capabilities . . . and emotions.

Read all this post on the latest psychotic fantasies of the stupid fuck who hate themselves so much they would exterminate all of us.

RELATED POSTS:
Has Human Evolution Stopped – Are We Now Masters Of Our Own Destiny
Will humans become redundant in your lifetime
The Perfect Killing Machine
Human takeover by machines may be closer than we think

Skilled Work Without The Worker

Unemployment Falls As Part Time Working Hits Record Levels And More Drop Out Of The Workforce
UK Unemployment Rises Again as part time jobs increase.
Green Policies Will Not Save The Planet But Are Costing Poor Families The Earth
Slaves Of The Machine

Despite The Science Being Discredited Mainsteam Media Still Plugs Climate Scare

I don’t get here enough these days, but Populis seem to be getting on top of things, they certainly got rid of the span site penalty, and traffic is going up. So perhaps it’s time Little Nicky Machievelli had a news lease of life:
Here’s something I posted under my Arthur Foxake alter ego:

Despite The Science Being Discredited Mainsteam Media Still Plugs Climate Scare
by Arthur Foxake

Just take a look at this great, steaming heap of bullshit from CNN and ask yourself why anyone watches a channel owned by a billionaire elitist who has openly said he thinks the global population should be reduced from 7 billion to 350 million. It’s a no brainer that the output from any news channel owned by a Nazi shit like Ted Turner is not going to report real news but pump out propaganda designed to brainwash you.
See below what I mean:

(CNN) — Average annual temperatures will start to consistently exceed the highest levels previously recorded in as little as seven years in tropical hotspots and within four decades for the majority of the globe if nothing is done to stop climate change, according to a new study published Thursday in the journal Nature. And by the end of the century, monthly average temperatures will be higher than at any time since at least 1860, according to the study, led by University of Hawaii geographer Camilo Mora.

The effects will be felt first in tropical climates, with the annual temperature range rising beyond the historical range in Manokwari, Indonesia, in 2020, according to a map that accompanies the study on the University of Hawaii website.

Mexico City’s date is 2031. It’s 2046 in Orlando, and a year later in Washington and New York, according to the group. Anchorage, Alaska, doesn’t climb on board until 2071.

“The results shocked us. Regardless of the scenario, changes will be coming soon,” Mora said in a statement posted by the university. “Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”
Read full story from CNN if your reading of choice is fairy tales.

What makes Little Nicky laugh is the confidence these guys have in their predictions for fifty years ahead when they can’t even forecast next weeks weather accurately most of the time

But if you could not be arsed reading the pseudo – scientific bullshit in the CNN item, just take a look at one statement in there that shows what a pack of scaremongering lies this is.

“Monthly average temperatures will be higher than at any time since at least 1860”
So these pseudo scientists, these research grant troughers are so determined to keep their piggy snouts in the swill they make up an idiotic and blatant lie to support their scaremongering.

Hotter than any time since 1860? It is conveniently just before meaningful temperature records began to be kept but if we look at the history books or newspaper archives for 1860 there are no reports of mass extinction, of millions of people starving because crops had withered in parched fields. In fact the average temperature since records began (around 150 years ago)shows a statistical increase of 0.4 of a degree.

Four tenths of a degree in 150 years. At that rate it will be six hundred years before we hit that two degree increase that scientists(but nobody else)thinks is so critical. Surely if these scientists are as clever as they would like us to think, they can devise a faster way to wipe out humanity.

And why would they want to wipe out humanity, you might well ask. Because they can of course, they’re scientists so that’s the only reason they ever need to inflict harm on their fellow humans.

Meanwhile back on Planet Reality

A Record-Setting Blizzard Killed 75,000 Cows and You Might Not Have Even Heard About It

Ranchers are still digging out thousands of their cattle that became buried in a record-setting snowstorm in South Dakota USA late last week and over the weekend. One would think the death of 75,000 cattle caused by upwards of five feet of snow so early in the autumn might get some national attention, or even warrant a world news report in Europe and elsewhere but as one blogger observed, it has taken some time for the news of the precipitation massacre to reach outside of local media.

Well of course, they are usually keen to report climate change but this is the wrong sort of climate change.

Read more on this story

snow in south dakota
Snow reaches mailboxes about four feet above ground in South Dakota

Little Nicky has warned of the replacement of news with propaganda since we started in 2005. People are waking up and relying on alternative news to learn what is really going on. And is it any wonder when traditional media offers us nothing but the bullsit shovelled out by their political masters. Bullshit like this:

Mainstream media all on board latest global warming fear-and-panic bandwagon after IPCC / New World Order report release.
from Natural News:

“Man-made, human-produced carbon dioxide is filling up the atmosphere, heating it to unsustainable temperatures that will ultimately melt the polar ice caps and flood the world.”

That’s the latest fear-mongering “report” from the United Nations’ International Panel on Climate Change. Only, none of that is true, as other climatologists and experts, including those at NASA reported as early as a few years ago.

Of course, none of this makes much difference to the New World Order (Not a real organization but a derogatory reference to those political groups, businesses and academics intent on promoting the idea that only a global, totalitarian government can ave humankind.) owned alarmist mainstream media, most of which has bought into and reported verbatim disproven nonsense regarding nonexistent global warming crises that is still being espoused from people like former Vice President Al Gore, whose own predictions of melting polar caps have been seriously debunked.”

Read more at Natural News

An incomplete list of scientists challenging the idea that global warming is caused solely by Carbon Dioxide emissions generated by human activity can be found at this wikipedia page. A warning however, Wikipedia can be edited by people with an agenda and this page repeats the misleading claim that 97 per cent of scientific papers support the global warming case.

In fact though the majority (not 97%, the authors of the meta analysis referred to assumed the support for their case of scientists who acknowledged that climate change was a problem did not express an opinion on the cause) support the probability that human activity has some imact on the climate, Carbon Dioxide was not identified as the sole cause, some citing deforestation, urbanisation and overpopulation as more significant factors.

According to this report in Forbes magazine the American business news publication only thirty six percent of 1077 scientists surveyed support the carbon Dioxide theory with a large majority suggesting the causes of the slight increase in global mean temperature are natural.

We can find any amount of level headed, objective research and analysis showing that the majority of independent scientists are highly sceptical of the Carbon Dioxide case and the bogus evidence (e.g. the notorious hockey schtick graph) coked up to support it. Here’s just one paper published in the peer reviewed journal Energy and Environment:

Why scientists are skeptical about the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis

Here’a a little taster from the first paragraph:

Abstract: The strong climate-forcing effect of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations advocated by the IPCC, is at odds with climate developments during geological, historical and recent times. Although atmospheric CO2 concentrations continuously increased during industrial times, temperatures did not increase continuously to the present level but stagnated or even declined slightly during 1880 to 1900, 1945 to 1977 and again since 1998.

Total solar irradiation rose from a low in 1890 to a first peak in 1950 that was followed by a sharp decline ending in 1977, giving way to a period of rapidly increasing radiation peaking in 2002 when solar activity started to decrease, possibly declining to a new Little-Ice-Age type low.

The Greenhouse Effect of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations, claimed and widely propagated by IPCC, is particularly vexing as it is widely over-estimated without adequate scientific justification. Large observed climate variations documented for geological and historical times, as well as the lack of insight into the behaviour of complex systems, seriously question the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) concept propagated by the IPCC.

The climate variability during industrial times was essentially governed by changes in solar activity with increasing atmospheric CO2 content playing a subordinate role.

Bit of an eye opener if you are used to seeing the claims of lying liars who tell you no “respectable” scientists disagree with the idea that Anthopogenic Global Warming is due to carbon dioxide emitted by business and domestic energy use.

But finally, in an old article for Times Of India SWAMINATHAN S ANKLESARIA AIYAR nails the truth of that alleged almost complete scientific consesus in support of CO2 driven AGW:

Greens say, rightly, that the best scientific assessment today is that global warming is occurring. Yet never in history have scientists accurately predicted what will happen 100 years later. A century ago no scientists predicted the internet, microwave ovens, TV, nuclear explosions or antibiotics. It is impossible, even stupid, to predict the distant future.

That scientific truth is rarely mentioned. Why? Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.

The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals. It is no co-incidence that so many scientists sceptical of global warming are retired professors: they have no need to chase research grants and chairs.

As The Daily Stirrer has always said, if you want to get to the truth of anything, just follow the money.

RELATED POSTS:
Climate Change And The Science Of Flogging Dead Horses
The science behind the climate change scare is now thoroughly discredited. So why do those who hoped to get rich or famous by promoting the alarmist and Warmageddonist case keep trying to beat some life back into the corpse?

In Spite Of The Scientific Evidence Piling Up against Them, Like True Cult Devotees, Warmageddonists Still Believe In The Carbon Dioxide
Below is a short list of all the global warming catastrpophes that we were promised would have happeneed by now (and anybody who said otherwise just didn’t understand the science). Well none of them have, mother earth does not take orders from mathematical models. Pathetically but rather touchingly the CAGWARTs as cult members are known, still believe In The Carbon Dioxide Monster
After Years Of Denial US Government Admits Geo – engineering experiment
Again the science academe have been exposed as a bunch of crooked, lying, self serving, sociopathic shits who will do anything for a research grant. After years of denials by scientists, universities and government departments it has finally been admitted that geoengineering experiments ale a likely cause of environmental chaos
Obama Tries To Revive Global Warming Debate As Advisers Warn Him’Avoid Economic Arguments’
Science is not one of Barack Obama’s strengths according to the man himself. But what is? Not making speeches as anyone who has listened to or read one of his speeches rather than reading the burblings of sycophantic journalists who reported it will know. If we looks at Obama’s latest speech on climate change it appears where he does excel is in pissing on his country’s constitution …
Climates and Lies: Another expose Of The Great Carbon Dioxide Lie
Another article exposing the lies of the climate change and environmental science lobby.
Global Warming Theory Debunked By NASA
NASA, America’s National Aeoronautical And Space Agency was in the forefront of the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare. Do you remember ‘The Science Is Settled’? Well it wasn’t, a trickle of those really awkward bastards who insist on thinking for themselves became a torrent and now even NASA are admitting it was all a hoax based on dodgy statistics and fraudulent physics.

Climate Change

RELATED POSTS:
How academic debate is suppressed on science topics like Climate Change, GMOs, Pesticides and Toxicity of medicines

Latest GM food scam; we are led by idiots who are advised by cretins.

Not long ago, only a few weeks in fact, the EU, under pressure from environmentally aware people (not global warming scaremongers but people who REALLY care about the environment, agreed to ban neonicotinoid pesticides because of very strong evidence that these chemicals are the main cause of the great bee die off.

Said pesticides, you may be aware, are the ones growers of Monsanto genetically modified seed are contractually obliged to use because Monsatan Monsanto seeds are genetically engineered to be resistant to the toxins in such pesticides.

So why are the cupid stunts in Westminster, led by Call Me Dave and his conservatives but with the support of Lib Dem and Labour leaders pushing for the lifting of bans on the introduction of genetically modified crops to the UK? Do the twats want to poison us or are they so spineless they dare not look at independent research like THIS and THIS that shows far from being safe, GM crops will do you about as much good as a spoonful of cyanide.

Yesterday minister Owen Patterson undid all his good work on denouncing wind farms as a money making scam created for Blair’s Corporate cronies, now he wants to hand over control of our countryside to Cameron’s corporate cronies Monsanto.

Mr Paterson said that GM offers “wonderful opportunities” that could benefit human health and the environment. (Benefit health Owen, Like THIS particular health benefit you mean – just one of many I must add to head off any science tits who come along trying to tell me one research project does not prove anything.

Patterson said GM production in the UK would mean less spraying of pesticides and less intensive farming. These are both lies. Monsanto Roundup herbicide and various pesticides (all toxic to humans) have to be sprayed on GM crops. You see the genetic modification used is not to make them immune to being eaten by caterpillars or chocked by weeds, it is to make them resistant to the active ingredients in those pesticides and herbicides. Unfortunately humans have not been genetically modifies to make us pesticide and herbicide resistant.

Mr Paterson also said that an expansion of GM crops could lead to the creation of more nature reserves because it would allow more intensive farming, therefore freeing up “space for biodiversity, nature and wilderness”. (In spite of this parliamentary support)

Mr Paterson is battling to persuade officials in the European Union to lift current rules which only allow one type of maize to be grown in the UK.

Britain is pushing for scores of GM crops to be given the green light by EU regulators, including herbicide tolerant maize and sugar beet. The politiians are in Monsantos corporate pocked and now the evil corporate empire is recruiting farmers by promising (falsely) lower costs and bigger profits and a chance to point a shotgun at GM protesters and say “Get orf moi laaaaaaaand.

RELATED POSTS:
Pesiticides To Blame For Bee Extinction, Not Natural Causes
The corporate shadow over democracy
Golden Rice Fraud: Genetically engineered crop nothing more than biotech hoax to beat GMO restrictions

The Independent Is No Longer Independent

Little Nicky Machiavelli has evidence The Independent newspaper is now owned by Monsasnto and exists only to publish Monsanto propaganda and advance Monsanto’s agenda of gaining a monopoly on seed stock for the world’s stape food crops.


If GM crops are bad, show us the evidence
Steve Connor
Monday 3 June 2013
full article at The Independent

extract

“It’s no longer tenable to call GM ‘unnatural’ and so inherently wrong

It is nearly 20 years since the first GM crops were grown.

Some 28 countries cultivate them on a commercial scale, and many hundreds of millions of people now safely eat GM food – directly or indirectly – on a regular basis. Yet, to judge from the rhetoric of anti-GM activists – from the rough-cut environmentalists to the smooth-talking purveyors of organic food – you could be forgiven for thinking that medical catastrophe and genetic Armageddon are upon us, courtesy of the “Frankenfoods” revolution.

Calestous Juma, a professor of international development at Harvard, is not one to mince his words when it comes to genetically modified crops. To paraphrase his speech at McGill University in Montreal later today, Juma believes the time has come for the vociferous opponents of GM to put up or shut up. The use of transgenic crops, he points out, has to date prevented the spraying of 473 million kilograms of toxic pesticides, reduced carbon dioxide emissions by 23.1bn kg – equivalent to taking 10.2 million cars off the road – and saved 108.7 million hectares of land from being turned into farmland. Rather than creating environmental havoc, GM crops have, by and large, been better for the environment than growing the equivalent conventional crops, with relatively lower yields and higher chemical input.

Equally, no-one has died or fallen ill directly as a result of eating GM food. Studies showing that GM food damages the health of laboratory animals have been discredited. Contrary to what the pro-organic lobby would have us believe, it is actually more dangerous to eat organic food – as the 53 people in Germany who died in 2011 from eating organic beansprouts tragically discovered.”

end extract

he hi wrong on all counts. Not only is there a mountain of evidence by perfectly crespectable scientists (a couple of nobel prizewinning biologists amongs them) that cast very serious doubts on some strains of GM staple food crops (the way they generalise is an attempt at deflection typical of the corporate ‘science’ lobby. No genuine scientist would ever say GM foods are safe or are not safe, they would examine GM seeds species by species.

Safety is not the primary issue here, the world is overpopulated, the planet cannot sustain 7 billion people, especially with the poor five billion demanding lifestyles enjoyed by the privileged two billion, Our New Unhappy Lords will reduce population one way or another, be it by war, famine, pestilence, plague of GM organisms. No, the real issue is about monopoly control of the seed stock.

Is this shit sucking sycophant, this corporate lackey, and rent seeking apology for a human being really asking us to believe it would be a good idea to had a monopoly on the food supply to a corporation whose track records shows they are utterly ruthless in pursuit of the corporate goals, whose criminal record showws they have repeatedly falsified data, lied, bribed and used threats and coercion to foist unsafe products on the world.

Connor says, “Show us the evidence” but as with the CAGWARTs (Carbon Driven Anthropogenic Global Warming Alternative Reality Twats), the GM lobby will try to deny any evidence that exposes their scam is invalid. As for Connor, if the cupid stunt is still asking for evidence what fucking planet has he been on for the past twenty years?

One of the top comments I read under his post was this:

Gail Evans:
a) The seeds are patented, which means farmers can no longer produce seeds from their own crops for the next season, but are forced into further monetary outlay to buy from GMO seed companies. If they do not and produce their own seed from GM source material, they can get sued for millions.

b) The chemicals used on these crops are highly toxic and in Argentina have resulted in rising cases of cancer.

c) The use of these chemicals is killing off the bee population which the planet needs for pollination.

d) The studies done by the French scientists, one of the few that have actually been allowed to be published in the Main Stream Media, have proved that these GMO crops cause cancer, infertility and shortened life spans. On the contrary, companies like Monsanto who have to employ people like Blackwater, have done all they can to gag the press so that they are the alpha and the omega on the whole subject.

In South Africa a full open, honest and fully disclosed Independent Scientific Study ( independent of all companies such as Monsanto and all their affiliates, known and unknown covert operatives such a Blackwater) by at least three different laboratories over no less than a period of five years. In the interim, all products containing any GMO ingredients, or any ingredients derived from a genetically modified plant, or any meat product fed a genetically modified feed, must be labelled as such in bold and clear type.

French GMO Research Finds Monsanto Corn Causes Cancer: America Should Pay Attention
http://www.policymic.com/articles/15889/french-gmo-research-finds-monsanto-corn-causes-cancer-america-should-pay-attention_ Fatal Soybean-

The documentary shows how the lucrative soybean industry in Argentina has culminated in the death of a great number of residents suffering from cancer due to the overuse of chemical pesticides.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K92N3EG_NA4 Monsanto Now Owns Mercenaries Blackwater Newly Named ‘Academi’ http://naturalrevolution.org/monsanto-now-owns-mercenaries-blackwater-newly-named-academi/

followed by this:

albalma 8 days ago
Evidence?

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=weed-whacking-herbicide-p&page=3

http://nobull.mikecallicrate.com/news/nobull-glyposate-roundup-may-in-fact-be-the-most-biologically-disruptive-chemical-in-our-enviornment-its-effects-are-insidious/

http://nosprayjeffco.com/2013/04/28/toxic-food-glyphosate-is-a-toxic-presence-in-our-food/

http://www.gmfreecymru.org/pivotal_papers/human_urine.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1257596/

Need more? Independently confirmed, Roundup is toxic! Saying otherwise is a crime and should be prosecuted because you are killing people! I have nothing against genetically modifying a plant to better survive, but the way these people are doing it is not ok!

then this:

pdjmoo 8 days ago:
The highly unregulated biotech re-engineering and patenting of life is highly dangerous and unethical. Science does not enough about the intract web of life to be meddling with singular aspects of our biosphere, creating chain reactions.

Further the issue of GMOs is more about the total impact on the environment and human health that is only now beginning to show up.

The patenting of reengineered seeds, the pesticides, chemicals, fertilizers required to grow them all owned by the same biotech cartel; and the devastation to our natural biodiversity, poisoning of our soils and waterways, killing off beneficial insects all have given our future over to a science still evolving and painfully disconnected from the greater health of our environment and human health. We are rolling the dice in a relatively new aspect of science, biotechnology, that has little or no oversight and regulation and much of it, once released, will be very difficult to reverse.

Finally, it is driven by a trillion dollar biotech cartel and, insofar as the gmo aspect and ownership of the global seed supply means control of the global food supply and the pesticides needed to control them. Not okay. YOUR FOOD, YOUR HEALTH

Back to me. GMOs are not the problem, it is making them resistant to chemicals that damage the environment and have unaccounted for reactions in the human body that is the problem.

As long as you improve the natural resistance, or growth of a plant that is not a problem at all. The problem is that by genetically modifying a plant to be resistant to weekiller and insecticide we turn that plant into a vehicle for delivering the toxin into the human food chain.

A recent report takes 123 pages to list and summarise peer reviewed research papers raising serious concerns about G M foods. Scientists respond with their usual knee jerk “ah but it’s not proper science (to a ‘scientist’ it seem, proper science is only that which affirms their prejudices)Well you should understand by now only a fool would take a scientists word for anything. Check the evidence for youself and then see if you agree with Steve Connor and the scientific crooks and liars he writes poropaganda for. Here’s the 123 pages of evidence they pretend to be unaware of

Not really evidence they will shout. Well look, the report lists project after project, all peer reviewed (scientists place great faith on peer review)so again we see the dishonesty and hypocrisy of those who defend the genetic engineering industry.

This article does not talk about the chemicals Monsanto customers are contractually obliged to use and which are deadly to humans. Science doesn’t need to tell me that putting agent orange in my food is bad for me, but it does say so: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691512005637 Rats died 2-3 times more rapidly than untreated animals. The author is a liar and he is welcome to sue me for saying so! I shall leave him without a career, a home, a family, a pot to piss in or a penny to scratch his arse with and take great pleasure in doing so.

Spinning The Climate

With fascist Lib Dem and Labour MPs trying to abolish free speech and press freedom to stop intelligent commentators exposing the great scam that was global warming and science tits getting more and more hysterical in their attempts to pretend that what is happening is not the exact opposite of everything they predicted, I found this interesting essay on how the deception was carried out.

SPINNING THE CLIMATE:
THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE
CHANGE (IPCC)
Vincent Gray

Here’s an extract from his introduction:

PREFACE
I have spent a lifetime on scientific research. My father was a working class intellectual, eager for knowledge. He took me to all the London museums and I remember a visit to the Royal Albert Hall to see the Exhibition which celebrated the discovery of Electromagnetic Induction by
Michael Faraday. This must have been 1931 when I was 9 years old. My secondary school in London, Latymer Upper, had top scientists, as the only job those days was teaching. I won a Major scholarship to Emmanuel College Cambridge and obtained a PhD degree from war work on flame thrower and incendiary bomb fuels.

I avoided academia as I wished to help industry, and over the years I had a range of jobs with industrial research organisations working on oil, protein, plastics, fibres, paint, adhesives, building, coal and forensic science in The UK, France, Canada and New Zealand. I published well over 100 scientific papers, several patents and several Chapters on books.

After retiring from my job in New Zealand in 1987 I worked for four and a half years in China on coal slurries. The colleges, in Hangzhou,and in Kunming,where I taught English during my last year, hadexcellent libraries of science journals in English.

I became interested in the Greenhouse Effect and gave several lectures on the subject in China. In a visit back to New Zealand in 1989 I was invited to comment on the drafts of the Supplement to the First Report (published 1992) that had been circulated to my former employer from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These comments were submitted, amongst others, by the Director, R.S Whitney. I submitted comments as a Reviewer for all of the subsequent IPCC Reports, including the Fifth
Report, which is now pending.

The IPCC is claimed by some to have provided evidence that the earth’s climate is harmed by changes in the atmospheric concentrations. of greenhouse gases. These claims are false. This report explains how dubious observations and some genuine science has been distorted and “spun” to support a global campaign to limit human emissions of certain greenhouse gases which has no scientific basis and no proven capacity to forecast future climate.

ENVIRONMENTAL RELIGION
Environmental religion believes that humans are destroying the “planet” and the “environment” and it requires reasons and evidence to j
ustify this belief. The movement became influential in the late 1960s. A number of local meetings led to the first United Nations Conference on the Environment in Stockholm in 1972. Successful attempts weremade to abolish pesticides, restrict economic development in many countries from restrictive laws and in 1988, the Montreal Protocol prohibited substances that deplete the ozone layer.

In the late 1970s the environmental movement began to adopt the theory that emissions of “greenhouse gases” were destr oying the earth by causing “global warming”.

THE LEAD – UP TO THE IPCC
There were several scares that misfired. The “Nuclear Winter”, (Turco et al 1983), based on computer models of a nuclear war, was shown to be a hoax. There arose a “shopping list” of “Man’s Impact on the Global Environment” (Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1971) with the preparation of a “short list” that could be exploited further. The earliest success arose from the discovery of the “ozone hole” (Molina and Rowlands 1974).who claimed that halocarbons in the stratosphere were destroying ozone and thus enhancing ultraviolet radiation.

The United Nations Environment Conference in Stockholm, 1972, acted on this claim and set up the machinery to ban the use of halocarbons with the Montreal Protocol which came into force on January 1st 1989.

There followed what amounts to a shopping list of supposed human effects on the environment which could be souped up to impose restrictions on human activity (MIT 1979). Prominent amongst these was the emissions of carbon dioxide from combustion of fossil fuels . Bert Bolin, the Swedish meteorologist was behind the World Climate Research Programme is 1979 and
several conferences in Villach, Austria.

The origins of the theory that so – called green house gases enhanced global temperature, and that additions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere would cause additional warming of the climate has recently been reviewed by Gray (2013). The idea was promoted in 1895 by the …Read all

And There’s More
This Iain Dale post is worth reading for itself but have a look at the comment thread to, it isn’t long but there are plenty of links cited to articles and scientific papers that prove “the science is settled” was always a big fat lie.

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeGreenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthAuthorGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribd

Ian Thorpe at Facebook

If You Weren’t Yet Convinced The Lunatics Are Running The Adylum, Here’s Proof.

With the number of Americans on food stamps hitting new highs year after year and the nation in dire financial straits and having trouble raising the money to fund it’s welfare bills, those very clever people, The Scientists, have come up with a plan.

As it is a plan devised by scientists it has, as regular follower of Little Nicky Machiavelli might expect, noting to do with helping the poor or solving any of the nation’s urgent problems and everything to do with flushing huge amounts of taxpayers money down the toilet.

‘Nasa is planning to lasso an asteroid and park it near the moon to study as part of a new, ambitious mission,’ the White House has confirmed. It might sound like a science fiction movie, but President Obama is expected to put $100 million aside for the asteroid rodeo in next week’s budget.

Plans already existed to send astronauts to an asteroid, but the galactic lasso is expected to speed the mission up by bringing the rock closer. It’s hoped that by examining the asteroid, scientists could work out how to mine them for materials and learn more about the mineral composition of the solar system.’

When asked what are the risks should the space ship Asteroid Wrangler fail to lasoo the rock and send it hurtling towards earth instead. The NASA dickheads have the answer, “A five hundred ton asteroid is no threat to earth, they said. Cupid Stunts, only a few weeks ago (science tits never know what is going on in the real world) an 10 ton asteroid exploded on entering the atmosphere, exploded releasing energy equivalent to 30 times that of the Hiroshima bomb, crashed into a remote part of Russia and caused the deaths of 54 people.

Imagine what a 500 ton lump of rock descending at 60,000 miles per hour could do it it came down in a heavily populated area.

If we are really serious about saving the planet, it is clear what we must do. We have to put all the scientists in a big spaceship and send them to the nearest inhabitable planet. That should satisfy their scientific curiosity and we would all be safe, at least for the 40,000 years it would take them to get there.

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeGreenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthAuthorGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribd

How Big Is The Universe? I Was Right.

A few years back Little Nicky had some good sessions in which I tried to impart some common sense to science heads (I do not call them science dicks because because that might imply they have dicks. Not having a dick is not a shortcoming in female scientists of course but the one arguing with me an generally behaving like the most fanatical member of a crazy Californian religious cult were all men)

One of the things Little Nicky liked to wind them up about was the question of what exists beyond the universe. Science dicks heads you see like to claim that before the big bang all the matter in the universe was compressed into a pellet the size of a mouse turd (i.e. slightly larger than Brian Cox’s brain). Ask them what was outside the mouse turd, a void, an infinite raspberry jelly,a graveyard for dead scientific theories and they would say “Nothing, all the space and time and science and jelly and cheese and typewriters and bubble gum were in the mouse turd. Nothing existed outside it. And then it went bang and started expanding like a giant pink bubble (that was coz of the bubble gum) and it gets bigger and bigger.

Why scientists, who are supposed to be clever, are too dim witted to get their heads round the meaning of infinity is like the origin of life, the nature of human consciousness and the question “Why does Dom Joli have a career on television”? a mystery.

Little Nicky would try to explain the idea of this shock wave emanating from Big Bang being the end of the universe was stupid. If you travelled from the centre of the universe to this notional wave and carried on you could keep going forever, a million billion zillion times further than you had already gone.

“You don’t understand science,” they said. Funny that, because it turns out I was right and the science heads were wrong.

An episode of Horizon on BBC 4 this weeks showed scientists are slow but they get there in the end, years after the rest of us have moved on.

How Big Is The Universe – Horizon

It is one of the most baffling questions that scientists can ask: how big is the Universe that we live in?

Horizon follows the cosmologists who are creating the most ambitious map in history – a map of everything in existence. And it is stranger than anyone had imagined – a Universe without end that stretches far beyond what the eye can ever see.

And, if the latest research proves true, our Universe may just be the start of something even bigger. Much bigger.

Brace Yourself For Solar Storms

About two years ago Little Nicky told you of a warning issued by the kind of people who occasionally raise their snouts from the trough of taxpayers’ money to look at the sun through radio telescopes.

They said we were entering a period of unusually high solar activity and ought to brace ourselves for trouble.

These people have also said solar activity was a far more likely cause of climate change that CO2 which only resulted in the CAGWARTs (Carbon, Anthropogenic Global Warming Alternative Reality Trolls turning up the volume on their whine machine to eleven.

So what kind of trouble might we be in for?

This kind of trouble.

Now it has to be said, this artice describes a worst case scenario, the events it warns of are possible but not probable.

But then, by the same criteria, all those doomsday predictions of CAGWART scientists (which very noticeably have not happened (Where did the UN’s 50 million global warming refugees go?)were always worst case scenario possibilities rather than certainties.

Still we did learn one valuable lesson from the Global Warming scare. Scientists cling just as tightly to the certainties offered by their religion as the believers in any traditional religion.

The Scientific Consensus That Didn’t Exist

The Scientific Consensus That Didn’t Exist

We all got fed up of hearing the two mantras of the global warming lobby a long time ago. To remind you, they were:

The science is settled.

and

Every respected scientist in the world supports the case for Anthropogenic Global Warming.

My friend and fellow member of the Really Awkward Buggars Union Graham Leah suspected this was not true as scientists scarcely agree on anything. So he did somne research on what respected scientists rather than government placemen media hacks have really been saying.

Bear in mind, we’re talking here about real scientists doing independent research in climate and environment related fiedls, not self serving bureaucrats of the United Nations IPCC,the self serving academics intent only on keeping their piggy snouts in the trough of taxpayers’ money or the empire building civil servants who just want bigger departments.

Researchers like:

Dr Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and UN-IPCC insider. NOT a sceptic of AGW to my knowledge

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography.

“Claims such as ‘2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous,” the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered “the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.”

or:

Dr Benjamin Santer, author of the 2007 IPCC report chapter on the detection of greenhouse warming – NOT A SCEPTIC of AGW to my knowledge.

“It’s unfortunate that many people read the media hype before they read the (IPCC report) chapter “on the detection of greenhouse warming.” I think the caveats are there. We say quite clearly that few scientists would say that the attribution issue [man-made climate change] is a done deal.

&

Dr Richard Lindzen (Atmospheric Scientist) Professor at MIT UN-IPCC Lead Author

“The consensus was reached before the research had even begun.”

“It’s not 2,500 people offering their consensus, I participated in that. Each person who is an author writes one or two pages in conjunction with someone else…but ultimately, it is written by representatives of governments, of environmental organizations like the Union of Concerned Scientists, and industrial organizations, each seeking their own benefit.”

&

Dr John Christy – Professor and Director of the Earth System Science Centre at the University of Alabama, Huntsville (also Alabama State Climatologist) UN IPCC Lead Author writes:

“I don’t see a catastrophe developing from our emissions into the air of what should be correctly identified as ‘plant food.'”

“Scepticism, a hallmark of science, is frowned upon. (I suspect the IPCC bureaucracy cringes whenever I’m identified as an IPCC Lead Author}. The tendency to succumb to group-think and the herd-instinct (now formally called the “informational cascade”) is perhaps as tempting among scientists as any group because we, by definition, must be the “ones who know” (from the Latin sciere, to know).”

&

Russia – Dr Yury Izrael, past UN IPCC Vice President, director of Global Climate and Ecology Institute, member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

“There is no proven link between human activity and global warming.”

&

USA – Dr. Charles Wax, past president of the American Association of State Climatologists.

“First off, there isn’t a consensus among scientists. Don’t let anybody tell you there is.”

Now Even The IPCC Admits CO2 Driven Global Warming Was A Scam

Now Even The IPCC Admits CO2 Driven Global Warming Was A Scam

Breaking news from the US – via Watts Up With That?: a leaked draft of the IPCC’s latest report AR5 admits what the brighter lights amongst us have ben saying for a very long time: that the case for CO2 driven, man-made global warming is looking more shaky all the time and that the sun plays a much more significant role in “climate change” than the “scientific consensus” of a billionaire, two baldie men and a bunch of rent – seekers has previously been prepared to accept.

Here’s the killer admission:
Many empirical relationships have been reported between GCR or cosmogenic isotope archives and some aspects of the climate system (e.g., Bond et al., 2001; Dengel et al., 2009; Ram and Stolz, 1999). The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism such as the hypothesized GCR-cloud link. We focus here on observed relationships between GCR and aerosol and cloud properties.

Why is this a game-changer? As the person who leaked the document explains, :
The admission of strong evidence for enhanced solar forcing changes everything. The climate alarmists can’t continue to claim that warming was almost entirely due to human activity over a period when solar warming effects, now acknowledged to be important, were at a maximum. The final draft of AR5 WG1 is not scheduled to be released for another year but the public needs to know now how the main premises and conclusions of the IPCC story line have been undercut by the IPCC itself.

Over to you, members of the Global Totalitarianism Cult.

We can all look forward a session of ROTFLOAO as we read their convoluted lies and ridiculous attempts to suggest that “one report does not disprove the case” (although if you remember it was one report from the IPCC on which the whole case was built).

We can be certain the responses will not include any apologies for the lies, misrepresentations, accusations that climate science sceptics are child murderers, mea culpa confessions of willful idiocy or admissions that those of us they said “can’t understand the science” were right all along because we did understand the science and saw right through the holes in it. No, I think it will be fear and panic spreading, scaremongering, rent – seeking, Nobel Prize grubbing business as usual for the great Climate Change Ponzi scheme. Because as Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals tells us, “The end always justifies the means,” and the end is advancing the Marxist global tyranny agenda.