Paedophilia is natural and normal for males’ says elitist adademic

Paedophilia is natural and normal for males’

Last week, after the conviction of Rolf Harris, the report into Jimmy Savile and Paedos-in-Parliament claims of an establishment cover-up to protect several senior MPs in Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet suspected of sex-offending after their names were mentioned in allegations that a molly house for elite businessmen, public servants and political figures was being operated under the front of Elm Guest House in south London, Britain went into a convulsion of anxiety about child abuse in the Eighties.

but why the eighties, OK, Jimmy Savile, Stuart Hall, Rolf Harris, Cyril Smith, and several senior Members of the Thatcher Government. While Leon brittan has denied the only specific allegation so far made against him, this former future Prime Minister has not yet offered an explanation of why he suddenly quite his post as Home Secretary, having been widely tipped to succeed Thatcher as Prime Minister for what by comparison was a lowly clerical job in the European Union.

What was he running away from? When the answer emerges it could trigger an even greater scandal that the MP’s expenses case a few years ago.

But all that is ancient history and while we should be concerned at the way the establishment closed ranks to cover up widespread allegations of wrongdoing, we should be actively demanding answers from organisers of an academic conference as to why they allowed a vile, pervy creep Professor of Psychology mic time to promote his agenda of normalising sex with underage girls and boys.

Read more:

Paedophilia is natural and normal for males’ says Psychology Professor

RELATED POSTS:
Major Study Reveals Extent Children In Care Suffer Abuse – The Independent
No Conspiracy Of Silence On Parliamentary Paedophiles? Really?

Britain’s Credit Rating Dowgraded By People Who Rated Toxic Debt Bonds

The downgrading of Britain’s credit rating, which will have little effect on us ordunary punters, is interesting only in that it has been done by a credit ratings agency closely which gave triple-A ratings to worthless toxic shite bonds (aka Collateralised Debt Obligations) sold by the banks to a lot of decent people who were persuaded they were putting their money in sound investments.

‘Moody’s announced on Friday night that it had cut the Government’s bond rating one notch from ‘Aaa’ – the highest possible level – to ‘Aa1’.

The agency pointed to “continuing weakness in the UK’s medium-term growth outlook, with a period of sluggish growth which [it] now expects will extend into the second half of the decade”.

Thus these ‘rating agencies’ which were created by the banks for the benefit of the banks. played a major role in the crash of 2008 are now the same agencies (just three dominate the world market) are now credit-rating countries and impacting upon the lives of many people.

While dropping from Aaa to Aa1 will have little immediate effect because few nations still retain an Aaa rating, and at Aa1 we still only pay 3.5% interest on our £trillion and a half debt, when the rot sets in seriously as it has in Greece, Italy, Spain and other Eurozone nations we are looking at paying between six and seven per cent on that £trillion and a half.

Any idea what six % of a trillion pounds is? No?

It is £60 billion a year. Or £1000 for every adult and child in the nation. Or about 5% of GDP. Or a hell of a lot more austerity measures than left wing politicians and media dickheads have been complaining about over the past few years.

First we need to get that debt down. If you don’t believe me, go to Greece, Spain or Portugal and ask how life is right now. Or go to Italy and you can join in the celebrations if Silvio Berlusconi is re elected on a platorm of standing up to the Gauleiters of Brussels. Then we need to dump politicians who are in the pockets of the New World Order bankers (all three major parties in the UK) and elect some leaders who are apable of thinking for themselves.

Shame and humility are not the greatest gifts of bankers or politicians, gobsmacking levels of arrogance are more their line. But their ranks a numbered in thousands, there are sixty million of us. Time to show them who is boss.

Update:

So Why Don’t The Bank Of England Just Do The Sensible Thing?

The Bank Of England is not what you think it is. Most people think Th Central Banks are owned by the nation, in fact I have seen many vitriolic argements about the US Federal Exchange in which well informed people of not particular political persuasion tried to explain that The Fed is owned by private inteests and thus does not have to do what is in the best interests of American citizens and US Liberals, the most fanatical members of the Obamessiah cult who insist their wondrous leader controls The Fed and thus everything it does is in the best interests of the American people and anyone who disagrees is a racist and a young earth creationist right wing nut job. Obamessiah cultists are not big on sanity.

The same goes for The bank of England although British lefties usually manage to be a teeny bit more rational in their responses to the truth.

We The Punters do not own the Bank of England, neither does The Queen nor the Government; it is owned by 1000 share holders whose identities we are not allowed to know (The Boggart Blog bookie is not taking bets on some of them being named Rothschild). So it doesn’t really matter because the 1,000 will decide what happens to the UK’s monetary policy anyway.

“In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank of England Nominees Limited, (BOEN), a private limited company, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. According to its Memorandum & Articles of Association, its objectives are:- “To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”

Bank of England Nominees Limited was granted an exemption by Edmund Dell, Secretary of State for Trade, from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because, “it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.” The Bank of England is also protected by its Royal Charter status, and the Official Secrets Act.”

OK, so now you know why the Bank Of England does not act in the interests of the people. Makes a lot of other things crystal clear doesn’t it.

Liberate Your Civil Liberties

Our civil liberties have been systematically attacked by the control freak government of New Labour. The Tories do not look as if they will do better on issues of personal freedoms in fact it is rumoured their draft manifesto includes a committment to restore droit de seigneur, Lib Dem leader Nick (Shagger) Clegg says this is his party’s moment. But with the main parties jumping on the public spending curbs bandwagon Vince Cable alone has labouiously pushed for so long, will the Lib Dems have the balls to take the civil liberties issue as their own. Labour as the party of sureveillance, databases are and national ID cards easy to hit but how does Clegg show dubious voters that faced with tough questions on personal freedom Cameron’s Bullingdon Bullies aka Lord Snooty And His Pals simply burst into a chorus of Lloyd George Knew My Father.

Austria marches to the right. Don’t Panic!Is free speech to blame?

A bit of a hyperbolic headline there but that is how we must play the game now to get keywords into the title and links and thus earn brownie points from the Googlebot that indexes our blogs.

To business. In last week’s election in Austria the far right political party did well, far better than anybody expected a party broadly sympathetic to holocaust deniers to ever fare in a democratic nation.

Predictably and unfortunately this has led to calls for new international laws limiting free speech. In this article, The Limits of Free Speech it is hard to know what the writer’s point is exactly other than that he thinks neo-nazis are very nasty people and should not be allowed to argue their case or contest elections.

Little Nicky Machiavelli has said before, when commenting on calls to ban the BNP, the best way to raise the profile of far right politics and racist movements is to ban them. Such organisations are highly skilled at exploiting victimhood.

The best way to incite violence against Muslims is to support those extermists who demand that criticism of their religion by non-Muslims be declared an offence. The best way to strengthen the case of Fundamentalist Christians is to try to silence them. Look how they have profited in America from the myth of their being driven out of England by official persecution for trying to practice their own religion.

There is a sliver of truth in that but it grossly misrepresents the reality. Nobody stopped them worshipping as they wished, what got them in trouble was their trying to opt out of the Church of England which was then as much an agency of government as a Christian Church. In effect they were trying to opt out of paying the Church’s tithe and that was like refusing to pay income tax and national insurance.

So trying to gag the far right might turn out to be very counter productive. Better to let them enjoy their handful of victories in local elections. “Free speech” has always been a pipe dream, even in the USA where it is iconised there are plenty of laws available to deal with those who step over certain lines.

Ireland, Europe and The Price Of Independence

A couple of weeks ago we brought you a story about how the European Palrliament (with the full support of Britain’s neofascist Labour Group) are planning to silence MEPs (your elected representatives) who try to express Euroscepitc views.

If the issue of Federalisation by stealth concerns you, you will want to take a look at the story For Europe; Against The EU on how the Irish voters are being threatened and bullied as they prepare to vote on the revised treaty that is simply a disguised version of the European Consitution rejected by voters in France and The Netherlands a few years ago.

The plan is clearly to esablsh a Bureaucratic dictatorship in a federalised Europe and the voice of the people counts for nothing against the interests of the bureaucratic elite.

And as you read, remember our government, the Labour Government, the so -called people’s party, were absolutely determined under both Blair and Brown to deny us the opportunity to vote on this issue.

You Must Never Question Authority

RELATED POSTS:
What did Europe do to make Britain leave

Hainged by the neck

The political obituaries are coming in for Peter Hain and pundits on television and other media are saying he is deader than Mandleson

Read The Rebel Who Tried Too Hard For a catalogue of Hain’s shifting principles as he went from student agitator to old Labour radical to New Labour opportunist and fan of Free Market Mania.

The fact remains of course, he has still not accounted for the £100 grand. Surely he cannot have spent it all on fake tan.

A Society in Decay

We have commented many times on the breakdown of society and the very visible symptoms in the streets of our towns and suburbs. The astounding revelations this week as the murderers of Gary Newlove were sentenced prove another example.

For all this the Government keeps trotting out its fraudulent statistics showing that crime is actually falling and certain bossy, meddlesome middle class harridans (yes I do mean you Polly Toynbee, get over your schoolgirl crush on Tony Blair and open your eyes to reality.)

The guilt tripping middle class socialists of Nu-Labour are quick to excuse the violent minority on our streets, to blame parents, political extremists, the consumer society etc. (and I have to say it is pretty rich to read comments written by a Chelsea Tractor driving media millionaire blaming consumerism for society’s ills as if the problem is nothing to do with them,) they will blame anybody but the thugs and scumbags who perpetrate such random acts of violence as we hear of every day.
The finger pointers of the right like to blame single parent families, the failure of the justice system, the nanny state, all the usual targets of the right.
Nobody ever thinks to blame the evil little shits who are responsible.

It is not the consumer society that causes these outrages, nor is it single parent families. Many single parents bring their children up well. It is not lack of male role models: it is lack of positive male role models and the failure of society to give out a clear message that everybody is free within the law, but step out of line and there will be consequences. For most people than message hardly needs to be given, the majority know instinctively where the lines are drawn. But a few, like the thugs who murdered Gary Newlove, are quick to exploit the stupidity of the guilt-tripping middle-class socialists in engineering laws that give more “rights” to the criminal than the victim. Ask them to stop trashing your car or vandalising your garden and the mantra is, “Why should we, what are you going to do about it? we know our rights.”

We need not feel guilty abot punishing these people, they do not come from poor homes, thus being victims of society, they come from uncaring homes and thus are victims of their parents. And if the thought in their heads when they murder, maim and destroy is not, “This is wrong,” but “there will be no consequences, I’ll only get an ASBO,” then they deserve to face the wrath of society.

The sooner the better.