Archives – The Daily Stirrer

Daily Stirrer archives for March and April 2015 are now online. Find all the news mainstream mead will not print or broadcast in The Daily Stirrer, always controversial, always ahead of the crowd, always against the establishment. Never going to appeal to Sheeple.

The Daily Stirrer – March 2015

The Daily Stirrer – April 2015

Use our search feature top of the Daily Stirrer main page’s right hand column to pickour keywords and find all posts on a particular topic for our enormous Greenteeth Labyrinh and Daily Stirrer sites.

Corporate Capitalism has replaced democracy

Todays election talking point (Image source)

A few of you may have noticed we are to elect a new government in less than a month. Election fever in the media is building to a climax as politicians of all parties and political pundits of all shades of self interest spout endless empty rhetoric about British values and democratic principles and who is best placed to save the NHS.

So far all of this has failed to inflame passions in the national psyche, the three main parties, Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat are utterly discredited and have totally lost the trust of the voters. Supporters of each are clutching as straws from the straw polls to try and claim their party is surging forward while support to the others is crumbling.

It is not so, more important than what the published data from polls tells us is what they don’t tell us, i.e. how they allocate the votes of people who have not made up their minds, say they do not intend to vote or simply decline to answer the questions.

To further complicate matters there is the question of upstart parties such as UKIP, SNP and the Greens, in previous elections just bit part players but now looking set to play a significant role.

The nature of our ‘first past the post’ voting system, which has ensured many people – myself among them – have never had the prospect of somebody we actually supported being elected as our Member of Parliament, also means that the only parties with a realistic chance of winning enough seats to enable them to form a government without minority party support are Labour and The Conservatives. As in the outgoing parliament, the party most likely to achieve third place, the Liberal Democrats, might hold the balance of power in a hung parliament.

In the campaign so far, leaders of the three main parties have hogged television and newspaper coverage and embraced a cosy consensus based on the need to continue with ‘austerity’, open the borders to more immigrants, give high priority to all issues related to gay and ethnic minority rights and support all military interventions in poor nations launched by the USA. They quibble over the nature or speed of cuts to the public sector and public services but none can suggest how the government deficit might be brought under control without far deeper cuts that any will talk about, or corresponding tax hikes which is another topic that is off limits.

All three main parties are pro-big business, support Britain’s further integration into an increasingly federalised European Union and are aligned with the neoliberal economic agenda set by the financial cartel based in the City of London and on Wall Street and by the major transnational corporations. Thus all are committed to signing the iniquitous “Free Trade” agreement being pushed by the corporate puppet Barack Hussein Obama and his corrupt administration in Washington, the Trans – Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TTIP), which will free global corporations from the tiresome obligation to obey national law on trading standards, consumer protection or workers rights.

Think Tanks like Chatham House, Centre for Policy Studies, Foreign Policy Centre, Reform, Institute of Economic Affairs and the International Institute for Strategic Studies, which are really slush funds for academics and failed politicians and which most British voters have never heard of) determined long ago the pro-corporate and generally pro-Washington policies that the main parties will sell to the public.

Bullying tactics in the world of party politics, powerful lobbying groups funded by corporate money and the revolving door between private corporations and the public sector (government departments and QUANGOS) have also helped shape the pro – corporate, pro – globalist agenda.

In 2012 veteral Labour MP Austin Mitchell, who is not seeking re – election, described the UK’s four biggest accountancy firms as being “more powerful than government.”

Mr. Mitchell said the companies’ financial success allows them privileged access to government policy makers. Of course the case for similar ‘privileged access’ could also be made about many other sectors, not least the arms industry and global agritech companies which armed with their poisons, unsustainable model of industrial agriculture and fraudulent claims for their products have been working hand in glove with government to force GMO’s into the UK despite most people holding the view that potatoes will not benefit from having the gene that makes them die when exposed to highly toxic to humans herbicide sprayed on them.

The power and influence of think tanks, lobbying firms and cronyism means the major parties provide the illusion of choice and democracy, but in reality offers the public via propaganda spread by the toothless and supine corporate media the choice of being governed by A, A or A. The knockabout, name calling, schoolyard squabble level debate of party politics serves as entertainment for a public that is increasingly disillusioned with politics, but does not effectively mask the reality that whoever wins the election, for the next five years the same people will be running the country as have run it for the past five, and the five before that.

The main parties have all accepted economic neoliberalism and the financialisation of the British economy and all that it has entailed: weak or non-existent trade unions, shinking manufacturing base, an ideological assault on the public sector, the offshoring of jobs, deregulation, privatisation of essential industries (and worse, the removal of laws that prevented foreign interests owning certain essential industries, and an economy dominated by financial services.

In Britain, long gone are the relatively well-paid manufacturing jobs that helped build and sustain the economy. In its place, the country has witnessed the imposition of a low taxation regime, low-paid and insecure ‘service sector’ jobs (no-contract work, zero hours contracts, macjobs, call centre jobs – much of which soon went abroad), a real estate bubble, credit card debt and student debt, which all helped create the illusion of a functional economy in order to maintain demand during the debt – led boom years under Labour Prime Ministers Blair and Brown.

Levels of public debt spiraled, personal debt became unsustainable and the deregulated financial sector demanded the public must write down its own gambling debts.

The economy now relies on a banking and finance-sector cartel that specialises in rigging markets, debt creation, money laundering and offshoring profits in various tax havens. The banking industry applies huge pressure on governments and has significant influence over policies to ensure things remain this way.

The economy, and the need to solve its problems will be glibly discussed throughout the campaign but there will be few words spoken about why or how the top one percent in the UK increased their wealth substantially in 2008, while the economic crisis was wiping out savings, destroying pension funds and sending unemployment figures rocketing. Even less will be said about why levels of inequality, under both the Conservative and Labour governments before 2010 and the Conservative / Liberal Democrat coalition have sky rocketed over the past three decades.

Above are some of the reasons why my vote will be going to the upstart Libertarian party UKIP (for the benefit of University Brainwashed politics and social science graduates, Libertarian does not mean “Extreme right wing” is actually means “opposed to the authoritarianism offered by Labour and Conservatives,) the only party that offers a way to smash the political metastasis the two parties of government have led us into.

UKIP are also the only party that can save the NHS because they are the only party that understands the NHS is in crisis because of a bloated and incompetent management structure. SO BLEAH, you hand wringing, wailing, teeth gnashing left wing idiots.

RELATED POSTS:
The New World Order?
It is hard to think of another phrase that gets authority worshippers quite so wound up as New World Order. The worlds always prompt a sneerfest among those who are quick to shout ‘Conspiracy Theory’ and slow to think. The phrase was not coined by a conspiracy theorist, nor was is some secret masonic code used on United States dollar bills to signify the intention to create a global empire (Novus Ordo Seclorum does not even mean ‘New World Order’ – more below).
The Free Trade Deception Almost No One Understands
More on those evil twins of global trade, the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Trans Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) which are not about freeing business from bureaucracy but freeing corporations from the tiresome obligation to obey national laws covering trading standards, food quality, workers’ rights, consumer protection and the environment. We’ve written about both treaties many times before.
Europe is waking up to the threat of globalism and the Transatlantic Partnership
Massive protests in Europe, an issue that unites the bitterly hostile right and left wing politiucal factions in the USA, the Trans Altantic Trade And Investment Partnership (TTIP) must be something quite special. The Daily Stirrer believes it is a corporate power grab, a bid to transfer the lawmaking systems of sovereign nations to bureucrats and corporate lawyers. Learn more below …
After TTIP Signed, Corporate Sovereignty Will Trump National Laws
News on the anti democracy, anti – sovereignty, corporate friendly TTIP and its sibling TPP, TISA, TAFTA and other treaties that change the meaning of the phrase ‘free trade’ to mean corporate businesses are free to do as they like without having to consider tedious civil rights, environmental protection and consumer protection laws.

Reasons Why This Pagan Will Not Vote Labour, Conservative Or Liberal Democrat.
a href=”http://greenteeth.blog.co.uk/2015/04/12/hillary-clinton-is-expected-to-announce-her-anointment-as-us-20233370/”>Candidate Hillary – another billionaire socialist the world doesn’t need
Death Of Democracy
GMO Corporate Lies
TTIP – the free trade deal that threatens freedom
Democracy is dying
Western democracy being murdered by corporate media
The Declaration of Interdependence – global fascism
Corporate Monopoly Men are winning
Corporatism is fascism
Globalism threatens democracy
The elite’s global takeover agenda
The elite are centralizing power on global bureaucracies

Simon Danczuk Becomes A National Hero

Got to admit it, Simon Danczuk, Labour MP for Rochdale is becoming something of a national hero for his dogged pursuit of those involved in covering up allegations of sex crimes in the establishment. Kudos too to The Daily Mirror and Sunday People, The Daily Mail and The Independent for reporting as fully as the law allows, details of the allegations as they emerge.

Danczuk wrote in today’s Daily Express:

” Not only is it a highly emotive subject that generates strong public feeling, it is also incredibly costly to society. It destroys lives, ruins potential and leaves a trail of misery.

In recent years, thankfully, this crime has been dragged out of the shadows and public attitudes show it to be a growing national priority.

Protective agencies are having to change their approach to reflect public concern. The police are witnessing a significant cultural shift in how they deal with child abuse and so too are local authorities. Similarly, the media is eager to report and raise awareness of what is arguably the worst crime imaginable.

However, there is one institution that has stubbornly resisted these changes and seems determined to keep this crime hidden in the shadows. It has provided inadequate leadership on the issue and has shown a complete lack of appetite in tackling abusers in their own ranks.

I refer to the British Parliament. Last week I told a select committee hearing that politics was the last refuge of child abuse deniers. This raised a few eyebrows at the time but everywhere you look politicians are showing my analysis to be true.

PM David Cameron has been happy to sound off about the legal case of Andy Coulson, thereby incurring the wrath of the judge in the hacking trial, when it comes to his own former policy adviser Patrick Rock, now facing serious charges of possessing child p

Allegations of child-abusing MPs have long swirled around Westminster and politicians have done nothing to address this. Cyril Smith’s abuse of boys was known for years but his party the Lib Dems cheered him to his grave.

Similarly stories of child abuse were frequently told about Margaret Thatcher’s aide Sir Peter Morrison. It was only after he died that fellow Tories, including Edwina Currie, outed him as a paedophile.

If there is one issue that is guaranteed to make some politicians lost for words, turn the other way or feign complete indifference it is child abuse.

The message from political parties is “move along, nothing to see here”. The silence is deafening.”

Read full article in The Daily Express

In another article Danczuk claimed he was pressured not to “out” Parliamentarians as suspected paedophiles last week, it was claimed, and was warned that naming one particular former MP could kill him.

Last week The Daily Mirror carried a story about former Labour MP Greville Janner, now a frail 85 year old, whose name repeatedly occurred in allegations of a Westminster Paedophile sex ring. Jenner was interviewed by police but was certified unfit to face forman questioning under caution because of dementia. Feasible seeing as the guy is 85 but why wasn’t he questioned twenty years ago?

Another story from The Mirror features the claims of a well known author:

Award winning author: I was abused at council care home linked to ex-Labour minister

RELATED POSTS:
What Happened To Battling Barbara’s VIP Paedophile Dossier

Now Sheffied Paedophile Grooming Scandal Explodes In Establishment’s Face

IMF And EU Annex Ukraine

Mike St, Mark and I were having a chat yesterday about the balancing effect on the mind of watching and reading such online news channels Russia Today and Voice of Russia to balance our view of events in Ukraine.

We were only slightly ahead of the game, today Global Research ran this:

Between the Western Bloc and Russia – The BBC and CNN versus RT
Governments and major corporations control or, at least, try to manipulate public opinion and discursive processes through mass media communication. They also wage information wars through the use of mass media communication.
Continue reading at Global Reseach:
Controlling the Lens: The Media War Being Fought Over Ukraine

Later I saw “Corporateocracy, another site that is truly sceptical (i.e. doubts everything) and they were on about the EU / IMF role in the Kiev coup while our leaders point unconvincing fingers at Putin.

imf eu ukraine
Business as usual for IMF. Picture source

from Corporatocracy
“It should be obvious that the recent putsch and regime change in the Ukraine inspired and backed by the U.S. shadow government, benefits the international banksters. For the average EU resident, only further economic displacement and diminished prospects can be expected from any inclusion of Ukraine into the EU dictatorial structure. Not so, for the corporatists who expects expanded opportunities as Consortium News analyzes agricultural and energy companies recent involvement within the Ukraine.

While corporatists want to extend their monopolies, the appeal of joining the EU with privileges of travel, relocation and better employment, has a very high price tag. So what is really behind the cover that the Brussels technocrats like to provide for the heavy hand treatment, which the banksters always demand? Look to the methods of the IMF for part of the answer.

Continue reading at Corporatocracy;
IMF and EU Capture Of Ukraine

Thousands rally in support of Syrian Army

You will not hear or read about this in mainstream media but I hope it will be read by some of the people who thought I was talking out of my arse when I said the FUKUS axis sponsored regime change war in Syria was a crime against humanity while Assad had the support of more than half his people (albeit half hearted support because they knew what could replace him would be a lot worse).

I also hope it will be read by some of the trolls who sent hate messasges and threats against my life (come and have a go if you think you’re hard enough) because they said I must be a fascist if I could not see it was right to support freedom and democracy loving human organ noshers against a vile tyrant who had dissidents stood against a wall and shot (quite humane and reasnable compared to someone cutting out your liver with a pocket knife and eating it as your dying eyes look on I would have thought).

I also hope it is seen by the idiotic, single figure IQ uinversity professor who waved his PhD and said that obviously I did not know what I was talking about and 99.9999999999 per cent of Syrians hated Assad because Barack Hussein Obama told them to, (actually this guy was so stupid and ill informed I can believe he was really a university professor.)

No, like all the other news item that prove Little Nicky Machiavelli was right as always, the story of thousands rallying in Syria to demonstrate popular support for Assad’s army will not be reported. Except here:

Thousands rally in support of Syrian army

from PressTV
In Syria, thousands of people have taken to the streets to hold rallies in support of the country’s army in its fight against foreign-backed militants.

On Wednesday, displaced Syrians of the Golan Heights gathered in Jdaidet al-fadl, a countryside in the capital, Damascus.

Supporters of the Syrian army also held similar rallies in the country’s western city of Homs.

The demonstrators held the country’s flag and hailed the Syrian army for its ongoing battle against foreign-backed militants.

Continue reading

BBC Admits Right Wing Extremists Led ‘Revolution’ In Ukraine

A BBC Newsnight report sub titled, “Neo-Nazi threat in new Ukraine,” reveals anti – Semitic and anto Russian nationalists armeded by the west (FUKUS axis) and led the mobs in Kiev. This is a direct contradiction of the months of Western media narratives portraying the “revolutionaries” as brave freedom fighters who only aspired to live in a progressive democracy where gay rights were given greater priority than sorting out the crippled economy. The rebels call for “freedom,” “democracy,” and “closer ties with the West,” with the most absurd example being the “I am Ukrainian” propaganda reel were just fictions invented by “Drop The Dead Donkey” style european and American reporters who believe their job is to make the news rather than simply report it.

As with the West’s support of sectarian terrorists across the Middle East, including Al Qaeda and those “progresive liberal” human organ noshing extremists in Syria and the Muslim Brotherhood supporters in Egypt who showed their support for liberal justice by carrying out summary roadside crucifixions of Coptic Christians, UK, EU and US agents found the most despicable elements in Ukrainian society to lead “revolution” for the sociopolitical reordering of Eastern Europe.

As the dust settles and the West’s proxy regime finds itself safely entrenched in Kiev, Ukraine – the Western media can now finally recuperate some of its lost legitimacy after months of denying the obvious – that armed Neo-Nazis led the so-called “Euromaidan” uprising.

Far from a “pro-democracy” uprising, the “Euromaidan” was yet another case of Western engineered regime change leveraging the good intentions of the ill-informed to mask the covert backing of ugly armed extremists, just as it had done all across the similarly engineered “Arab Spring” in 2011.

We are at war, but not with Islam, China, Iran or Russia, our enemies are our own governments and elites.

Resistance Is Futile – Sovereign Nations Will Be Assimilated

The real reason why the FUKUS axis stirred up a revolution in Ukraine?

from Russia Today:

“The West’s proposed financial aid will not solve Ukraine’s economic problems, but increase austerity, professor of political economy Jeffrey Sommers told RT.

If the self-proclaimed government in Kiev cooperates with the IMF, it will be regarded as legitimate in the West, even if its decisions are unpopular in Ukraine itself, Sommers says.”

Continue reading

RELATED POSTS:
World On The Brink – USA And Russia Square Up In Ukraine

We Haven’t Mentioned Libya For A Bit – Time For A Quick Look

Little Nicky Machiavelli’s blog seems to have become the place for reporting war and civil conflict in Jenny Greenteeth’s ever expanding media empire. While our attention has been focused on Syria, Mali, Ukraine and other places we have not forgotten the first domino to fall in the global elite’s war on national sovereignty, Libya.

Though you may not have heard much from Libya in mainstream media, this does not mean that in the wake of a FUKUS axis regime change campaign of bombing and supplying weapons to psychopaths which brought down the unpleasant but effective Gaddafi regime, an Obama worshipping, gay rights obsessed ‘liberal’ democracy has emereged in its place.

Time we had a quick look at the current situation to remind ourselves that (a) the people who want to depose the government are not automatically the good guys and (b) just because local tyrants like Gaddaffi and Assad are shits, this does not mean there aren’t bigger shits waiting to replace them.

The Libyan Bedlam: General Hifter, the CIA and the Unfinished Coup

from URUKNET.INFO
On Friday, Feb 14, 92 prisoners escaped from their prison in the Libyan town of Zliten. 19 of them were eventually recaptured, two of whom were wounded in clashes with the guards. It was just another daily episode highlighting the utter chaos which has engulfed Libya since the overthrow of Muammar Ghaddafi in 2011.

Much of this is often reported with cliché explanations as in the country’s ‘security vacuum’, or Libya’s lack of a true national identity. Indeed, tribe and region seem to supersede any other affiliation, but it is hardly that simple.

On that same Friday, Feb 14, Maj. Gen. Khalifa Hifter announced a coup in Libya. “The national command of the Libyan Army is declaring a movement for a new road map” (to rescue the country), Hifter declared through a video post. Oddly enough, little followed by way of a major military deployment in any part of the country. The country’s Prime Minister Ali Zeidan described the attempted coup as “ridiculous”.

Read full article: The Libyan Bedlam – URUKNET.INFO

RELATED POSTS:
leaderless, lawless Libya slides into chaos

Mainstream Media Reporting Of Syria Still Shows Al Qaeda Bias

After all the videos of the human organ noshing brave freedom fighters struggling to liberate Syria from the clutches of evil dictator Assad so they can burn, tortue, crucify and dismember Christians, Jews and people who are just the wrong sort of Muslims as part of their campaign to establish a secular liberal democracy, you’d think the New World Order controlled press and TV corporations would have learned.

Unfortunately they haven’t.

“Western news media reportage on the rampant criminal activities of foreign-backed paramilitary groups operating within Syria still relies heavily on unreliable sources frequently referred to as “activists.” Such spokespersons routinely claim the Syrian military are committing atrocities against the Syrian population. The reports are often disputed by the Bashar al-Assad government and proven suspect or false when additional information is unearthed by independent researchers and alternative news media.

In July 2012 UK journalist Charlie Skelton of The Guardian reported that Western news outlets remain willing accomplices in a propaganda campaign being carried out by public relations practitioners. According to Skelton, “the spokespeople, the ‘experts on Syria’, the ‘democracy activists’ … The people who ‘urge’ and ‘warn’ and ‘call for action’” against the Assad regime are themselves part of a sophisticated and well-heeled propaganda campaign to allow NATO forces to give Syria the same medicine administered to Libya in 2011. “They’re selling the idea of military intervention and regime change,” Skelton reports,

and the mainstream news is hungry to buy.”

Read full article on Dodgy Syria coverage at Global Research

New Media Site Formerly Devoted To Obama Repelled By His Choice Of Allies

At the foot of yesterday’s post I ran a link to a story in the New York Times, formerly USD Print Media’s most devoted Obama worshippers, about how the President’s new best mates, the brutal and cannibalistic Al Qaeda affilitated Syrian rebels were butchering Assad loyalists.

The NYT coverage I linked to was rather limited in scope as most of their site is behind a paywall. Here is the perspective offered by another Obama loyalist media channel, (links to disturbing video and images)The Daily Beast on the kind of people Barack Hussein Obama wants to ally the USA, Britain and other NATO powers with.

And if you are still physically attached to your Sunday lunch, why not take a look at this story of Syrian rebels carrying out a massage of inhabitants in several Syriac christian villages. A video included in this report but not yet authenticated purports to show Syrian rebels dismembering a young girl with a saw, starting while the child is alive.

If there is to be any intervention in Syria it now must surely be on the side of Assad who in the brutality league looks like Accrington Stanley playing against Manchester United or Chelsea.

Do you understand now why Little Nicky Machiavelli said we should have stood back and let Assad deal with the unrest, allowed Gaddafi to crush the libyan rebellion and let Mubarak sort out the Muslim Brotherhood inspired dissent in Egypt.

Some places are just not suited to western style democracy.

25 Ways To Suppress The Truth

Have a look down this list and count how many of these tactics you see being used daily by mainstream print and broadcast media and the political, academic and business establishment

From Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, from political debates, to television shows, to comments on a blog.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

Source

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE
Government Corporate Mind Control Conspiracy

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeGreenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthAuthorGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribd

Ian Thorpe at Facebook

Bin Laden Died Of Natural Causes – I Told You So

Oh ye of little faith, those of you who doubted Little Nicky when after the Obama White House claimed credit for taking out terror chief Osama Bin Laden, I told you that Bin Laden had been dead for years, kidney disease had done for him some time between 2002 and 2005. I even gave you video of the late Benazir Butto leaking the news of the bin Laden death (peacefully in his bed) shortly before she was assassinated, (coincidence – mmmmmmmaybe, make up your own minds on that one)

Well doubters, what do you make of this.
(“But Nicky” cry the doubters, “this is a web news site, we only believe stuff we hear or read of from mainstream media.” – fools, when have they ever been right.)

A former agent of the CIA has revealed that al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden has died of natural causes five years before the US announced his death.

“In an interview with Russia’s Channel One, Berkan Yashar, who is also a Turkish politician, said the US has not killed the al-Qaeda leader.

“In September of 1992, I was in Chechnya, that’s when I first met the man whose name was Bin Laden. This meeting took place in a two-story house in the city of Grozny; on the top floor was a family of Gamsakhurdia, the Georgian president, who then was kicked out of his country. We met on the bottom floor; Osama lived in the same building,” Yashar said.

According to the former CIA agent, he personally knew Bin Laden’s three Chechen bodyguards, who had protected him until his death and witnessed his death on June 26, 2006.

“Even if the entire world believed, I could not possibly believe it,” Yashar said. “I personally know the Chechens who protected him, they are Sami, Mahmood, and Ayub, and they were with him until the very end.”

“Only three Chechens buried him, according to his will” in the mountains on the Pakistan-Afghan border, he said.

Yashar added that the CIA abducted one of the bodyguards, Sami, before the announced killing of Bin Laden last year.

He says the bodyguard disclosed to the US the exact place of burial in the mountains.

“There was no assault. I know the American operations from the inside: they find the grave, dig out bin Laden and tell everyone about this. They need to show how technologically the security services worked, how each step was controlled, and then present it as a great victory to show that taxpayers are not paying taxes for nothing,” he said.

Washington announced on May 2, 2011 that Bin Laden was killed by US forces in his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

The lack of transparency over bin Laden’s death has cast further doubt over the announcement.”

Pakalertpress.com (There’s a video too but it’s in Russian.

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeGreenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthAuthorGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribd

Ian Thorpe at Facebook

An Abortion Of Free Speech

Little Nicky brings you a linbk to an item by my secret twin Ed Butt who now posts at Bubblews.

The trial currently taking place in the United States of abortionist Kermit Gosnell and the truly sickening practices of his private (for profit) abortion clinic in Philadelphia (The City of Brotherly Love) is receiving scant coverage in U S the mainstream media even though emerging details, were a political hot potato like abortion not involved, would keep the story at the top of the news throughout the proceedings and probably long after.

Abortion Of Justice: Why The Media Silence On The Kermit Gosnell Trial

This may not seem to be much to do with Britain but as well as abortion there is another issue at stake. Because Dr. Gosnell is an African American those who criticize him are being accused of racism and hate crimes.

So again we see a demonstration of the left’s fear and loathing of free speech, a free press and the truth.

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeGreenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthAuthorGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribd

Ian Thorpe at Facebook

The Decline And Fall Of Broadcast Media

Blogger Frank Davis has a fine article online today, here’s a sample:

Norman Tebbit, one time chairman of the Conservative party, and no friend of the BBC, writes:

Contrary to what many of my critics believe, I regard the BBC as a valuable national institution, which served us well over many years. Its principal failures have sprung from an inbred culture which evolved into a censorship of dissident voices. Its habit of recruiting from a narrow range of political – and of late, politically correct – thought has led to a damaging arrogance.

Well, he’s quite right about the inbred culture recruited from a narrow range of the political spectrum. But, in my experience, this isn’t anything new: the BBC has always been left wing. It was when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister in the 1980s, 30 years ago. But would it be any better if it was right wing? And precisely why is it a “valuable national institution”?

he crisis is the inevitable result of media professionals, like politicians no longer living in the same universe as us mere mortals, I’d say.

The Man Who Is The Mostest In Love With Obama

The American media is nothing if not biased. British media may lean so far to the left it looks almost ready to capsize but the American mainstream media in its efforts to deify Barack Obama turned turtle long ago. And there is no American news or current affairs commentator with his or her tongue quite so far up Obama’s arse as Chris Matthews.Never heard of him? Matthews is the guy who back in 2008 … Read moreThe Man Who Is The Mostest In Love With Obama

Shock, Horror! Lib Dem Ministers In Coalition Are Thinking For Themselves

It’s rather revealing to see the press united in condemnation of Vince Cable’s confession that he had gone to war with Rupert Moloch Murdoch’s media empire over News International’s attempts to make Sky ( BskyB ) a wholly owned subsidiary.

Not so long ago the media were uniting against Murdoch family empire building plans.

Let’s not forget Murdoch already owns a sizeable chunk of UK print media and has a controlling interest in satellite broadcasting. It was only thanks to Vince Cable earlier this year that News International were blocked from gaining a controlling interest in ITV which under a Labour government led by Murdoch’s best buddy (until he ceased to be useful to The Dirty Digger) Tony Blair.

So the question is do we want to be governed by a coalition of elected MPs or by the most facistic and self interested of corporations headed by a leading member of The Bilderberg Group.

Before the terminally gullible among you reach for the hate keys to tell me there are no such things as conspiracies and the Bilderberg group are not shape shifting lizard men read this.

Elsewhere there are more reports obtained by under cover reporters secretly recording “off the record” conversations revealing that unlike the unthinking automatons who make up most of the Conservative and Labour parliamentary parties, the Lib Dems are actually having heated debates about what needs to be done.

The press are more agitated about the idea of independent minds in government than they are about the failure of public service providers to keep the country moving throughout the cold weather.Obviously the meeja lefties of Fleet Street and Broadcasting House still don’t understand what coalition government means.

Either that or they yearn for a return to the days of New Labour with it’s loonytoons economics and the authoritarianism of the politically correct thought police, the people who made gay rights issues more of a priority than sorting out unemployment, the NHS or the fubar schools system

So far the coalition have given us a mixed bag of results. We would have to grade them fair to middling with a lot of room for improvement. And the Europhilia and enthusiasm for greater integration being displayed is a big worry. But they have made a few steps in the right direction on rolling back the nanny state’s invasion of our wheelie bins, living rooms, kitchens and beds.

Media Unites Against Murdoch

A story featured in all todays papers concerned an alliance against the march of Murdoch.

This is how The Gurdian told it:
British Media Unite Against Murdoch

This headline from The Guardian made us feel there is some chance of resisting the inexorable march of corporate fascism. We have blogged many times on the takeover of British media by corporations controlled by Rupert Murdoch’s News Intrnation, a creping subjugation of the means of spreading information carried out for almost tweny five years with the complicity of governments led by Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.

Many people are sure, although it is unlikely ever to be proved that Blair’s betrayal of Independent Television was nothing more than what was promised to Murdoch in return for delivering Dowing Street into New Labour’s hands.

Now it seems the increasingly beleagured companies that must try to compete with the Murdoch monster are at last seeing that their survival depends on collaboration.


Fleet Street’s highly factionalised newspaper industry today set aside historic differences to join forces in an unprecedented assault against the power of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire.

The companies behind the Daily Telegraph and the Daily Mail – both supporters of the Conservatives – united with the owners of the Guardian and the Labour-backing Daily Mirror to petition Vince Cable, the business secretary, to consider blocking News Corporation’s proposed £8bn full takeover of the satellite broadcaster BSkyB, which trades under the name Sky .

Fearful of the combined might of an integrated News Corp-Sky operation, which would include the Sun, the News of the World, the Times and book publisher HarperCollins, the complainants said the “proposed takeover could have serious and far-reaching consequences for media plurality”.
The Evil Empire of The Media is not going to go down without a fight however.

Rupert Murdoch responds to his rivals and appeals to Vince Cable – a reponse printed in The Guardian

RELATED POSTS:
Goodbye Analogue
Who Needs HDTV

MORE Controlversialist and contrarian comment in The Daily Stirrer

Hainged by the neck

The political obituaries are coming in for Peter Hain and pundits on television and other media are saying he is deader than Mandleson

Read The Rebel Who Tried Too Hard For a catalogue of Hain’s shifting principles as he went from student agitator to old Labour radical to New Labour opportunist and fan of Free Market Mania.

The fact remains of course, he has still not accounted for the £100 grand. Surely he cannot have spent it all on fake tan.