MH370: Why Would People Believe Fairy Stories

As new media began to scoff at the latest episode in the Flight MH370 saga, one ‘aviation expert’ who is on the United Nations payroll sneered, “Of course even now some people will not believe this find proves the plane went down where we said it did.

Well I’m not up to speed on this one, having been preoccupied writing fiction, but it did strike me ass interesting that the official version had the plane going into the water to the south west of western Australia. And the wreckage was washed up on Reunion Island, near Madagascar (and Diego Garcia) on the other side of the Indian Ocean.

Having noted that point I shrugged and moved on, leaving it to the relatives of the Flight MH370 dead to point out the peoblems with this latest bucket of whitewash thrown into the Indian Ocean. And one of them duly obliged to the chagrin of the interviewer on BBC Radion 4 today. The Tap reports:

“On BBC Radio 4 this morning, one of family representatives said they are not yet convinced the flapperon is from MH370. James Naugtie tried to steamroller her into saying it was, but she resisted.
If it was supposed to have crashed into a 4 mile deep area of the Indian Ocean, and it took 5 men to lift it, what kind of currents and forces were supposed to allow it to wash up on a beach?”

Yeah …

RELATED POSTS:

Massive Explosion in China: Do We Know the Full Story?
The massive explosion at a chemical plant in the city of Tianjin in northern China was a shocking eveny by any standard. But as usual in recent years, once the initial horror recedes the unfortunate accident narrative starts to unravel. The first thing we notice is that the disaster is very convenient for certain parties, the second is that official news reports just don’t make sense, and the third is that eye witness reports contradict the edited news stories. Now read on …

title-20694204

I was doing jokes in my brief and emotionally exhausting career as a stand up thirty years ago about Leon Brittan, Ted Heath and the restSayle). So I want to know why it took the police and crown prosecution service so long to catch up.

Here’s a taster from a long article by investigative journo and documentary maker Tim Tate. Unfortunately Tim does not do deep linking on his blog but you can see the full article HERE .

Over recent months two separate police forces have been carrying out enquiries into a snippet of 30-year-old gossip about a dead man. The Met and North Yorkshire Police have been interviewing people who, in the early to mid 1980s, heard a rumour that the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan had molested a young boy at a weekend retreat. I am one of them.

There are a number of oddities to this story, and, together with the rest of the strange saga of Leon Brittan, they shine a light on the frustratingly opaque progress of historic child sex abuse investigations. They also provide a litmus test for Lord Justice Goddard’s Independent panel Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.

The rumour first.   In the early 1980s I was a researcher on Roger Cook’s BBC Radio 4 investigative programme, “Checkpoint”.  The editor of the series had a source inside 10 Downing Street who was in the habit of passing on juicy titbits of scurrilous gossip about members of Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet.

Why he did this was something of a mystery: “Checkpoint” was a fine programme, but it rarely strayed into political investigations. I never met the source, but according to our editor, he simply enjoyed gossiping over drinks at a private club both belonged to. To my knowledge, nothing had ever been done with the tittle-tattle he related.

The Brittan story, though, was different. According to the source, Brittan had been attending a weekend house party somewhere in North Yorkshire (he was initially MP for Cleveland & Whitby, then Richmond, N. Yorks): at some point he was supposed to have molested a young boy.   Local police allegedly attended, but very quickly were ordered off the case by Special Branch officers. There were no details of where exactly this happened, nor what exactly Brittan was supposed to have done.

Despite the sketchy nature of the rumour – and perhaps because I still lived in Yorkshire and had some relevant police contacts – I was instructed by my editor and the BBC’s (then) assistant director-general, Alan Protheroe, to make some discreet enquiries.

Over several weeks I spoke to a succession of contacts within the police. All said they knew nothing. Finally, I approached an officer in the neighbouring West Yorkshire Police Special Branch with whom I had an occasional, if slightly uneasy, working relationship. He agreed – reluctantly – to make some enquiries: very quickly thereafter he told me he was not going to pursue them.

And there our own investigations stopped. We told Alan Protheroe that we could find no evidence to support the rumour and I went back to work on more regular “Checkpoint” stories.

We were not, of course, alone in hearing this rumour. Private Eye had also picked it up and subsequently ran a short piece suggesting that members of the security service were trying to smear Brittan with false child abuse allegations.

Labour Lose Wrexham After Allegations Of A Cover-Up

Let’s be absolutely clear from the start, this is nothing to do with the cover ups of child abuse in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, Bradfrd and around the country. It is just another example of the culture of cover up that exists throughout the public sector.

That Labour is the party involved is pure coincidence. Serves ’em right though for gloating about the Tories getting their arse kicked by UKIP.

from Breitbart London:

Labour have lost control of Wrexham Council in Wales after ten of their own councillors, including the leader of the group, walked out of the party amidst allegations of a child abuse style cover-up of poor management. They previously led the council as the largest part of a “rainbow coalition” including councillors from other groups.

Before the walk-out there were 23 Labour Councillors, meaning the opponents of the leader Cllr Neil Rogers were in a majority. This would have enabled them to force him out as leader by a resolution of the group.

The dispute is believed to have started when the Labour party became unhappy about plans to cut spending in the borough. Things got decidedly worse when Cllr Rogers fired a fellow Labour member Cllr Malcolm King from the council’s governing Executive Board.

The two men have spent most of today mudslinging at each other with Rogers claiming King was sacked for incompetence. King claimed that there had been a cover-up of concerns about how the council is being run, comparing the actions of Rogers to those who hid child abuse.

By resigning from Labour, Rogers can continue as leader of the Council – whatever King thinks of him – as long as he can hold together his coalition. Breitbart London spoke to veteran former executive committee member Cllr Bob Dutton who confirmed that Cllr Rogers was likely to stay on as leader.

Continue reading

Now what was the word that time travelling bloke invented? Omnishambles?

Scandal hit Rotherham ‘deleted abuse files’

rotherham sex scandalDuring the Rotherham by election campaign UKIP’s vote was boosted when left wing bigots in the social services department removed two children from a foster home because the foster parents were UKIP supporters. So according to these hypocrites its better to be getting gang raped by paedophiles than cared for by Kippers.

In a move that puts them among the contenders for lying, self serving shits of the decade, a title previously held by the lying, self serving shits of East Anglia University Climate Research Unit and their famous Climategate email scandal, but still in a league of their own un terms of complete and utter shittiness, it has emerged that the scum sucking scab lice of Rotherham Council’s controlling Labour group and the public servants they employed had deleted files in order to cover up their complicity in the blatant and systematic child abuse perpetrated under the noses of council officials.

What’s worse of course is that it is now known that senior officials and police officers helped cover up the crimes (mostly committed by Pakistani men) because they feared being accused of racism.

This is not an indictment of Pakistani men, the people involved were only a very small minority, those not willing to accept they had emigrated to a country where a girl’s sexual availability is not determined by the fact that she is out of her home alone or with only female friends.

It is however an indictment of the cancerous culture of political correctness and left wing hypocrisy and double standards that have corrupted the public sector in Britain.

from the Daily Telegraph:

‘Top ranking staff ordered raids to delete and remove case files and evidence detailing the scale of Rotherham’s child exploitation scandal, sources have revealed.

More than 10 years before the damning independent inquiry revealed sexual exploitation of 1,400 children in Rotherham a raid was carried out on the orders of senior staff to destroy evidence, it has been claimed.

In 2002 high profile personnel at Rotherham Council ordered a raid on Risky Business, Rotherham council’s specialist youth service, which offered one-to-one help and support to vulnerable teenage girls, ahead of the findings of a draft report, according to the Times.

Also read:

Rotherham sex abuse report author: ‘The utter brutality is what shocked me most’

Here are a couple of extracts quoted by Elizabeth Grice from an Interview with the report author Alexis Jay:

“The utter brutality is what shocked me most,” she says. “It is really hard to describe it – the horrible nature of the sexual acts and the brutality of the controls these girls were subjected to. There was a vast amount of truly horrific material. I was taken aback at how callous, how violent, the operations were. These were girls of 11 and 12. They were children. The violence was worst. Petrol dousing was used as a form of intimidation. Oral and anal sex were so often a means of control and punishment. It was truly frightening that people in our country could be doing that.”

“I had no idea when I started out of the true scale of child-sex offending or the brutality,” she says. “You would not be human not to be affected. I would not like it if I wasn’t. It made me all the more determined to make some kind of redress for the victims. To say: ‘I believe you.’ I understand [from conducting an investigation into child sexual exploitation (CSE) in the Western Isles] how much it means to child victims to have their story told. And to be believed.”

And (if you don’t mind using one of you five-a-month free articles from the Financial Times) UKIP has Rotherham in its sights after child sex abuse scandal

There is of course a lot more to come out on child sex in the council care system, the celebrity sex scandals have simply been a diversion. Big names like Jimmy Savile and Cyril Smith are sensational and sell newspapers but the worst abusers operate under the radar, and behind the shield of left wing political correctness it seems.

RELATED POSTS:
Centralized power – the worst of all possible worlds

Rotherham – Bad New For The Nation But It Gets Better And Better For The Kippers
Why The Left Love Paedophiles
Politically Correct threat to free speech
Children and The New World Order
Latest neo-nazi-Liberal Outrage – The Criminalization Of Parenthood
Politically Correct Thinking – A Straitjacket On Liberty
Why Do Those On The Political Left Assume They Have A Monopoly On Goodness And Truth
Conspiracy Theorists Are Sane

CPS Forced To Reveal Damning Report On Cyril Smith

Another great result for the blogosphere. As we bloggers are still basking in the glory of having forced the main political party leaders to accept that EU membership under the current terms and conditions is not in Britain’s best interests AND that the negligible (if any) benefits of unrestricted immigration are far outweighed by the economic and social costs (a fact admitted by senior Labour MPs Jack Straw and David Blunkett, who rather strangely were not branded racists by the leftie luvviocracy over their flirtation with reality, another great goal goes in.

Resolute campaigning by alternative news website Exaro has forced the CPS to reveal details of the damning CPS report on paedophile activities involving Cyril Smith, which was not acted upon after being presented to prosecutors in the 1970s.

from Exaronews.com (click to read more)

cyril smith

Many people are saying these crimes happened so long ago it would be almost impossible to prosecute them even were Smith alive to stand trial. This is not the point however, the culture of close ranks and cover up still exists in the corridors of power and in organisations, many in the public sector, of which we ought to be able to expect the highest standards of integrity and openness.

Until that culture is eradicated the crime of Cyril Smith, Jimmy Savile and far too many others will remain relevant.

Move Along Plebs, Nothing To See Here

I really get very pissed off with the kind of media luvvies who, though total nonentities, manage to delude themselves that they are slebs or somehow important and thus it is their duty to close ranks with the establishment and dismiss those who seek the truth as conspiracy theorists.

One such luvvie is barrister Barbara Hewson who instead of fighting for truth and justice is making it her business to give aid and comfort to the judges and senior lawyers who are currently shitting themselves fear ing that theirs might be the next name to emerge linked to allegations of hitoric sex abuse, or assisting in covering for those who were involved in organised kiddie fiddling.

In Spiked Ms Hewson writes:

“The inquiry was brought about when conspiracy theorists and claims-makers complained about the disappearance of some files in the Home Office, which allegedly represented a cover-up of sexual misconduct by a dastardly elite.

The originator of the missing files, the late Geoffrey Dickens MP, was a well-known right-winger and moral entrepreneur. In 1991 he called on parliament to bring in a law to punish sex offenders by ‘castrat[ing] the buggers’. Dickens once showed his files, ‘where people have written to me with information’, to the home secretary, Leon Brittan QC, back in 1983.”

Hewson then rants on about there being only unsubstantiated allegations and never any real evidence to back up calls for an investigation. all this proves is not only do you not need to be very bright to become a barrister so long as your family have the right connections, you don’t even have to be a competent liar.

When this cupid stunt says there is no evidence does she mean because it was snatched by Special Branch as was the case with the dossier prepared by Barbara Castle or the one prepared by Geoffrey Dickens MP whose son has said that after Dickens’ death he was approached by security services and warned that if he ever revealed any of the names in his father’s documents very bad things would happen.

Or does she mean no evidence like the lack of evidence people high up in the elite were so afraid of they prevented, THREE yes THREE separate investigations into the allegations against Cyril Smith.

Just how big a shitload of evidence do you need before an elitist lawyer will admit you have evidence against another elitist that warrants an investigation.

Little Nicky Machiavelli has said before that the historic abuse cases, though serious, should not be our main concern. What we should really be issed off about is evidence of how the deep the culture of corruption and cover up among the elite goes.

Barbara Hewson’s defence of kiddie fiddlers among her caste shows that even the bottom feeders in the elite pond are involved.

RELATED POSTS:

Scotland Yard searching the Bodleian Library for Barbara Castle Dossier on alleged child sex abuse

Police to Investigate Allegations of Labour-LibDem Rochdale ‘Deal’ on Paedophiles
Child abuse scandal in Rotherham

Organising a Cover Up to Cover Up a Cover up? Just call The Establishment

Judge Butler-Sloss Best To Head Elitist Paedophile Cover Up Inquiry – Cameron

hush puppies paedophiles scandalWhat have Hush Puppies to do with the scandal? Sssssshhhhhhhhhhhh.

Confirming his support for the controversial appointment of Baroness Butler – Sloss as head of the inquiry into allegations of an elite paedophile ring that operated within Westminster and Whitehall, Prime Minister David Cameron said:
“Objections to Judge Butler – Sloss chairing the inquiry on the grounds that her brother (the late Michael Havers, attorney General to Margaret Thatcher’s government) was involved in the original cover up of the paedophilia ring allegations are ridiculous as are complaints that a previous paedophilia inquiry led by Butler – Sloss was found to be incomplete and full of errors.

Its a pity the Judge doesn’t have a history of drink problems, if she had we could call her Butler-Shloshed. Just sayin’

Obviously this task will be very difficult to carry out so who better to oversee the inquiry than someone who has first hand experience of covering up the crimes of paedophiles in high places.”

OK, I may have exaggerated some of that just a teeny bit, but …

It Does Not Stop There, This Story Is Spreading Like A CAncer Through The Political Establishment

from The Daily Telegraph

The retired judge leading an inquiry into historic sex abuse said she will not quit yesterday, after her brother was linked to an Establishment ‘cover-up’ of the paedophile ring she will be investigating.Baroness Butler-Sloss faced demands for her resignation less than 24 hours after she was appointed to lead the Government’s probe into abuse by politicians and other powerful figures.

MPs and legal experts said it was inappropriate for her to keep the post given that her late brother, Sir Michael Havers, was Attorney General under Margaret Thatcher when many of the abuse claims were first made.’

Read full article in The Daily Telegraph

And there’s more – much more:

She’s a nutter aher husband was a nonce who frolicked with young prostitutes it turns out

And even more

div id=”140710-paedo2″

Labour peer escapes probe over 20 child sex claims because he is ‘suffering dementia’

from The Daily Mirror

Alleged victims of the Labour peer were boys in care homes but the member of the House of Lords will not be arrested A Labour peer facing more than 20 allegations of historical child abuse looks set to avoid prosecution after doctors said he was unfit to be quizzed because he has dementia.

The member of the House of Lords will not be interviewed or arrested by police investigating the alleged sexual assaults – which include claims of rape – on vulnerable boys in children’s homes.

One man said he was aged seven when the politician visited his care home and entertained him and the other youngsters there with magic tricks.

The suspect, who was the local MP at the time, then allegedly took him aside and sexually assaulted him.

His alleged victim claims he reported it to police but it was not properly investigated. He said: “That man humiliated me. He told me to undress and then fondled me. It scarred me for life. I complained previously and the police made a mess of it. But they are being very good now.”

Officers have compiled a dossier of more than 20 complaints against the peer, who was previously accused of child abuse more than two decades ago.

At the time, the serving MP agreed to be interviewed by police and a file was passed to the Director of Public Prosecutions, but no charges were ever brought.

Another police investigation into similar allegations is ongoing and a file has been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service.

Sources confirmed the peer would not be questioned after two doctors examined him and concluded he was unfit.

Read full article at The Daily Mirror

Ten serving and former prominent politicians are being named by people making complaints about historical sex abuse to child protection charity

from The Daily Mail

The names of at least ten politicians are being named ‘again and again’ by people calling a child abuse hotline, it was revealed today.

Senior police officers and judges are also among the ‘famous’ members of the establishment being identified by alleged victims, according to a charity.

The telephone calls have come since Theresa May announced an independent inquiry into how claims of child abuse were dealt with by public institutions, political parties, the church and the BBC.

Ten serving and former prominent politicians are being named by people making complaints about historical sex abuse to child protection charity

RELATED POSTS:
Diversity’ Does Not Mean Quotas. Why Do The Left Have To Rewrite The Dictionary.

Butler-Sloss ‘kept allegations of bishop’s abuse quiet because she she ‘cared about the Church”

Paedophilia is natural and normal for males’
No Conspiracy Of Silence On Parliamentary Paedophiles? Really?
Why Do The Left Love Paedophiles
New World Order Paedophiles
The Left, the NWO and legalised paedophilia
So Who Do You Pick To Investigate Elitist Paedophile Rings
Why The Intellectual Elite Truly Despise The Lower

Covering Up 8000 Square miles Of Ocean

Here’s How They’ll Piece Together What Happened to Flight MH370

from wired.com/autopia

The southern Indian Ocean is a vast, desolate and hostile place churned by relentless currents and vicious storms. It is rarely traversed by air or sea, and anything lost there may never be found. That includes Malaysia Airlines Flight 370.

But those scouring a remote swath of ocean west of Australia received tantalizing clues this week, including new radar data about the plane’s velocity. The data, gleaned from radar between the South China Sea and the Strait of Malacca, suggests MH370 was traveling faster than previously believed, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority said. That means it would have run out of fuel sooner. The agency called this new information “the most credible lead to where debris may be located.”

The new lead prompted a sudden change in focus to an area 685 miles northeast of where everyone had been searching. They’d spent much of the week scouring an area 1,600 miles west of Perth, Australia, after satellite images taken Sunday by Airbus Defence and Space and Monday by Thailand’s Geo-Informatics Space Technology Development Agency revealed what might be a debris field.

The shift to yet another area underscores just how perplexing the search has been, and how investigators have been frustrated in their quest for answers. None of the aircraft or ships in the region have found anything of note, and the photos may reveal nothing more than whitecaps or the flotsam so often found at sea.

With little else to go on, investigators have so far relied upon the scant satellite and radar communication the plane had after going dark 90 minutes into its March 8 flight to Beijing with 239 people aboard. Finding a debris field would be akin to a homicide detective locating a body, allowing investigators to begin piecing together, literally and figuratively, what happened.

“Until they find debris,” said Dr. Vernon Grose, a former investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board, “they’re spending all that money on this, and it’s totally useless.”

Continue reading at wired.com

Meanwhile relatives of the missing passengers are protesting in China and Malaysia, accusing the relative government of withholding information.

RELATED POSTS:
Emirates Airways CEO Thinks He Knows What Happened to Flight MH370
Giant whitewash slick sighted in the Indian Ocean