I really get very pissed off with the kind of media luvvies who, though total nonentities, manage to delude themselves that they are slebs or somehow important and thus it is their duty to close ranks with the establishment and dismiss those who seek the truth as conspiracy theorists.
One such luvvie is barrister Barbara Hewson who instead of fighting for truth and justice is making it her business to give aid and comfort to the judges and senior lawyers who are currently shitting themselves fear ing that theirs might be the next name to emerge linked to allegations of hitoric sex abuse, or assisting in covering for those who were involved in organised kiddie fiddling.
In Spiked Ms Hewson writes:
“The inquiry was brought about when conspiracy theorists and claims-makers complained about the disappearance of some files in the Home Office, which allegedly represented a cover-up of sexual misconduct by a dastardly elite.
The originator of the missing files, the late Geoffrey Dickens MP, was a well-known right-winger and moral entrepreneur. In 1991 he called on parliament to bring in a law to punish sex offenders by castrat[ing] the buggers. Dickens once showed his files, where people have written to me with information, to the home secretary, Leon Brittan QC, back in 1983.”
Hewson then rants on about there being only unsubstantiated allegations and never any real evidence to back up calls for an investigation. all this proves is not only do you not need to be very bright to become a barrister so long as your family have the right connections, you don’t even have to be a competent liar.
When this cupid stunt says there is no evidence does she mean because it was snatched by Special Branch as was the case with the dossier prepared by Barbara Castle or the one prepared by Geoffrey Dickens MP whose son has said that after Dickens’ death he was approached by security services and warned that if he ever revealed any of the names in his father’s documents very bad things would happen.
Or does she mean no evidence like the lack of evidence people high up in the elite were so afraid of they prevented, THREE yes THREE separate investigations into the allegations against Cyril Smith.
Just how big a shitload of evidence do you need before an elitist lawyer will admit you have evidence against another elitist that warrants an investigation.
Little Nicky Machiavelli has said before that the historic abuse cases, though serious, should not be our main concern. What we should really be issed off about is evidence of how the deep the culture of corruption and cover up among the elite goes.
Barbara Hewson’s defence of kiddie fiddlers among her caste shows that even the bottom feeders in the elite pond are involved.
Scotland Yard searching the Bodleian Library for Barbara Castle Dossier on alleged child sex abuse
Police to Investigate Allegations of Labour-LibDem Rochdale ‘Deal’ on Paedophiles
Child abuse scandal in Rotherham